WallStSmart

Agilent Technologies Inc (A)vsWaters Corporation (WAT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Agilent Technologies Inc generates 59% more annual revenue ($7.37B vs $4.64B). A leads profitability with a 19.5% profit margin vs 3.6%. A appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.25. A earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 63/100 (C+).

A

Buy

63

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 8.5Value: 4.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.99

WAT

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.0Value: 2.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 4.85
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ASignificantly Overvalued (-65.8%)

Margin of Safety

-65.8%

Fair Value

$77.73

Current Price

$156.47

$78.74 premium

UndervaluedFair: $77.73Overvalued
WATSignificantly Overvalued (-45.9%)

Margin of Safety

-45.9%

Fair Value

$225.66

Current Price

$421.63

$195.97 premium

UndervaluedFair: $225.66Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

A1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
25.6%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 25.6%

WAT3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
113.4%10/10

Revenue surging 113.4% year-over-year

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.8510/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
2.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

A3 concerns · Avg: 3.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
29.0x4/10

Moderate valuation

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.994/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

WAT4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.524/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
1.1%3/10

ROE of 1.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
3.6%3/10

3.6% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : A

The strongest argument for A centers on Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 19.5% and operating margin at 25.6%. PEG of 1.25 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : WAT

The strongest argument for WAT centers on Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 113.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : A

The primary concerns for A are P/E Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : WAT

The primary concerns for WAT are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 102.5x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 3.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

A profiles as a mature stock while WAT is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

A carries more volatility with a beta of 1.24 — expect wider price swings.

WAT is growing revenue faster at 113.4% — sustainability is the question.

A generates stronger free cash flow (439M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

A scores higher overall (63/100 vs 45/100), backed by strong 19.5% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Agilent Technologies Inc

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Agilent Technologies, Inc. is an American analytical instrumentation development and manufacturing company that offers its products and services to markets worldwide. Its global headquarters is located in Santa Clara, California.

Waters Corporation

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Waters Corporation is a publicly traded Analytical Laboratory instrument and software company headquartered in Milford, Massachusetts.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?