Acadian Asset Management Inc (AAMI)vsBrookfield Asset Management Inc (BAM)
AAMI
Acadian Asset Management Inc
$53.88
+3.74%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $1.92B
BAM
Brookfield Asset Management Inc
$42.87
-1.08%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $70.28B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Brookfield Asset Management Inc generates 755% more annual revenue ($4.82B vs $563.70M). BAM leads profitability with a 51.6% profit margin vs 14.2%. AAMI trades at a lower P/E of 24.4x. BAM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 66/100 (B-).
AAMI
Hold49
out of 100
Grade: D+
BAM
Strong Buy66
out of 100
Grade: B-
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
-245.4%
Fair Value
$15.03
Current Price
$53.88
$38.85 premium
Margin of Safety
-400.1%
Fair Value
$10.47
Current Price
$42.87
$32.40 premium
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Every $100 of equity generates 125 in profit
Strong operational efficiency at 33.2%
Keeps 52 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Strong operational efficiency at 67.9%
Revenue surging 31.1% year-over-year
Large-cap with strong market position
Every $100 of equity generates 22 in profit
Areas to Watch
2.6% revenue growth
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
Trading at 31.7x book value
Earnings declined 14.8%
Moderate valuation
Trading at 8.5x book value
Weak financial health signals
Earnings declined 20.7%
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : AAMI
The strongest argument for AAMI centers on Return on Equity, Operating Margin.
Bull Case : BAM
The strongest argument for BAM centers on Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 51.6% and operating margin at 67.9%. Revenue growth of 31.1% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bear Case : AAMI
The primary concerns for AAMI are Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Price/Book.
Bear Case : BAM
The primary concerns for BAM are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Piotroski F-Score.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
AAMI profiles as a value stock while BAM is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.
AAMI carries more volatility with a beta of 1.30 — expect wider price swings.
BAM is growing revenue faster at 31.1% — sustainability is the question.
BAM generates stronger free cash flow (706M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
BAM scores higher overall (66/100 vs 49/100), backed by strong 51.6% margins and 31.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Acadian Asset Management Inc
FINANCIAL SERVICES · ASSET MANAGEMENT · USA
BrightSphere Investment Group Inc. is a publically owned asset management holding company. The company is headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts.
Brookfield Asset Management Inc
FINANCIAL SERVICES · ASSET MANAGEMENT · USA
Brookfield Asset Management is a leading global alternative asset manager and one of the largest investors in real assets.
Visit Website →Compare with Other ASSET MANAGEMENT Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?