WallStSmart

Acco Brands Corporation (ACCO)vsCrane NXT Co (CXT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Crane NXT Co generates 15% more annual revenue ($1.80B vs $1.57B). CXT leads profitability with a 7.8% profit margin vs 3.7%. ACCO trades at a lower P/E of 6.9x. CXT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 63/100 (C+).

ACCO

Buy

57

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.0Value: 9.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.80

CXT

Buy

63

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.0Profit: 6.0Value: 5.3Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.47
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ACCOUndervalued (+39.3%)

Margin of Safety

+39.3%

Fair Value

$6.82

Current Price

$4.24

$2.58 discount

UndervaluedFair: $6.82Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CXT.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ACCO3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
6.9x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.6x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

PEG RatioValuation
0.768/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

CXT3 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.4x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
22.0%8/10

Revenue surging 22.0% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
41.9%8/10

Earnings expanding 41.9% YoY

Areas to Watch

ACCO4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Market CapQuality
$387.69M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
3.7%3/10

3.7% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
1.463/10

Elevated debt levels

EPS GrowthGrowth
-51.6%2/10

Earnings declined 51.6%

CXT4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Profit MarginProfitability
7.8%3/10

7.8% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
1.163/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.472/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ACCO

The strongest argument for ACCO centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.76 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : CXT

The strongest argument for CXT centers on Price/Book, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 22.0% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : ACCO

The primary concerns for ACCO are Market Cap, Profit Margin, Debt/Equity. Thin 3.7% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : CXT

The primary concerns for CXT are Profit Margin, Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ACCO profiles as a value stock while CXT is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

ACCO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.18 — expect wider price swings.

CXT is growing revenue faster at 22.0% — sustainability is the question.

CXT generates stronger free cash flow (49M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CXT scores higher overall (63/100 vs 57/100) and 22.0% revenue growth. ACCO offers better value entry with a 39.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Acco Brands Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · BUSINESS EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES · USA

ACCO Brands Corporation designs, manufactures and markets consumer, school, technology and office products. The company is headquartered in Lake Zurich, Illinois.

Crane NXT Co

INDUSTRIALS · BUSINESS EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES · USA

Crane NXT, Co. focuses on payment and merchandising technologies. The company is headquartered in Stamford, Connecticut.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?