WallStSmart

Accel Entertainment Inc (ACEL)vsFlutter Entertainment plc (FLUT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Flutter Entertainment plc generates 1153% more annual revenue ($17.02B vs $1.36B). ACEL leads profitability with a 3.8% profit margin vs -2.2%. FLUT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 49/100 (D+).

ACEL

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 6.0Value: 6.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.15

FLUT

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 6.7Profit: 3.0Value: 5.7Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.29
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ACELUndervalued (+24.2%)

Margin of Safety

+24.2%

Fair Value

$14.64

Current Price

$12.06

$2.58 discount

UndervaluedFair: $14.64Overvalued
FLUTSignificantly Overvalued (-21.5%)

Margin of Safety

-21.5%

Fair Value

$118.79

Current Price

$100.49

$18.30 premium

UndervaluedFair: $118.79Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ACEL0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

FLUT3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.1910/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
1.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
17.4%8/10

17.4% revenue growth

Areas to Watch

ACEL4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$991.37M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
3.8%3/10

3.8% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
2.181/10

Elevated debt levels

FLUT4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Operating MarginProfitability
2.3%3/10

Operating margin of 2.3%

Debt/EquityHealth
1.393/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-5.5%2/10

ROE of -5.5% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ACEL

ACEL has a balanced fundamental profile.

Bull Case : FLUT

The strongest argument for FLUT centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 17.4% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.19 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : ACEL

The primary concerns for ACEL are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Profit Margin. Debt-to-equity of 2.18 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 3.8% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : FLUT

The primary concerns for FLUT are Operating Margin, Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ACEL profiles as a value stock while FLUT is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

FLUT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.10 — expect wider price swings.

FLUT is growing revenue faster at 17.4% — sustainability is the question.

FLUT generates stronger free cash flow (153M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FLUT scores higher overall (49/100 vs 46/100) and 17.4% revenue growth. ACEL offers better value entry with a 24.2% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Accel Entertainment Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · GAMBLING · USA

Accel Entertainment, Inc., is a distributed games operator in the United States. The company is headquartered in Burr Ridge, Illinois.

Flutter Entertainment plc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · GAMBLING · USA

Flutter Entertainment plc is a sports betting and gaming company in the United Kingdom, Ireland, Australia, the United States, Italy, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Dublin, Ireland.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?