WallStSmart

ACV Auctions Inc. (ACVA)vsLithia Motors Inc (LAD)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Lithia Motors Inc generates 4730% more annual revenue ($37.73B vs $781.10M). LAD leads profitability with a 1.9% profit margin vs -8.0%. LAD earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 55/100 (C).

ACVA

Avoid

34

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 2.0Value: 6.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.47

LAD

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.0Value: 8.0Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.38
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ACVAUndervalued (+56.7%)

Margin of Safety

+56.7%

Fair Value

$16.62

Current Price

$8.03

$8.59 discount

UndervaluedFair: $16.62Overvalued
LADUndervalued (+8.4%)

Margin of Safety

+8.4%

Fair Value

$349.64

Current Price

$427.48

$77.84 discount

UndervaluedFair: $349.64Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ACVA0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

LAD3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
11.7x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

PEG RatioValuation
0.758/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

ACVA4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$1.38B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-14.4%2/10

ROE of -14.4% — below average capital efficiency

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.472/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

LAD4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.0%4/10

1.0% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
1.9%3/10

1.9% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
3.6%3/10

Operating margin of 3.6%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ACVA

Revenue growth of 11.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : LAD

The strongest argument for LAD centers on P/E Ratio, PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.75 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : ACVA

The primary concerns for ACVA are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : LAD

The primary concerns for LAD are Revenue Growth, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Debt-to-equity of 2.53 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 1.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ACVA profiles as a turnaround stock while LAD is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

ACVA carries more volatility with a beta of 1.82 — expect wider price swings.

ACVA is growing revenue faster at 11.8% — sustainability is the question.

ACVA generates stronger free cash flow (75M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

LAD scores higher overall (55/100 vs 34/100). ACVA offers better value entry with a 56.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

ACV Auctions Inc.

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS · USA

ACV Auctions, Inc., operates a digital marketplace that connects buyers and sellers for online wholesale vehicle auctions. The company is headquartered in Buffalo, New York.

Lithia Motors Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS · USA

Lithia Motors, Inc. is an automobile retailer in the United States. The company is headquartered in Medford, Oregon.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?