WallStSmart

Aeva Technologies, Inc. Common Stock (AEVA)vsCrowdstrike Holdings Inc (CRWD)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc generates 24884% more annual revenue ($5.40B vs $21.60M). CRWD leads profitability with a 0.8% profit margin vs -150.1%. CRWD earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 43/100 (D).

AEVA

Avoid

23

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 2.0Value: 6.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: -7.63

CRWD

Hold

43

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 9.3Profit: 3.0Value: 3.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.00
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

AEVAUndervalued (+38.1%)

Margin of Safety

+38.1%

Fair Value

$20.57

Current Price

$13.66

$6.91 discount

UndervaluedFair: $20.57Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CRWD.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

AEVA0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

CRWD4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Market CapQuality
$285.53B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

EPS GrowthGrowth
533.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 533.0% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.169/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Revenue GrowthGrowth
25.8%8/10

Revenue surging 25.8% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

AEVA4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$996.79M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Price/BookValuation
34.1x2/10

Trading at 34.1x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
-117.8%2/10

ROE of -117.8% — below average capital efficiency

CRWD4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
1.1%3/10

ROE of 1.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
0.8%3/10

0.8% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
8.402/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : AEVA

Revenue growth of 11.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : CRWD

The strongest argument for CRWD centers on Market Cap, EPS Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 25.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : AEVA

The primary concerns for AEVA are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Price/Book. Debt-to-equity of 3.72 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : CRWD

The primary concerns for CRWD are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 4647.7x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 0.8% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

AEVA profiles as a turnaround stock while CRWD is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

AEVA carries more volatility with a beta of 2.41 — expect wider price swings.

CRWD is growing revenue faster at 25.8% — sustainability is the question.

CRWD generates stronger free cash flow (406M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CRWD scores higher overall (43/100 vs 23/100) and 25.8% revenue growth. AEVA offers better value entry with a 38.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Aeva Technologies, Inc. Common Stock

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Aeva Technologies, Inc., through its frequency modulated continuous wave (FMCW) sensing technology, designs a 4D LiDAR on chip that enables the adoption of LiDAR in various applications. The company is headquartered in Mountain View, California.

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. provides cloud solutions for endpoint and cloud workload protection in the United States, Australia, Germany, India, Israel, Romania, and the United Kingdom. The company is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?