WallStSmart

AudioEye Inc (AEYE)vsUber Technologies Inc (UBER)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Uber Technologies Inc generates 131424% more annual revenue ($55.23B vs $41.99M). UBER leads profitability with a 17.3% profit margin vs -10.9%. AEYE appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.37. UBER earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

AEYE

Avoid

27

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.0Profit: 2.0Value: 6.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: -3.42

UBER

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.0Profit: 7.5Value: 5.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.47
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

AEYEUndervalued (+63.0%)

Margin of Safety

+63.0%

Fair Value

$18.91

Current Price

$7.93

$10.98 discount

UndervaluedFair: $18.91Overvalued
UBERUndervalued (+0.4%)

Margin of Safety

+0.4%

Fair Value

$71.93

Current Price

$71.67

$0.26 discount

UndervaluedFair: $71.93Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

AEYE0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

UBER5 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
35.1%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 35 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
85.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 85.5% YoY

Market CapQuality
$146.39B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

P/E RatioValuation
15.9x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.79B8/10

Generating 2.8B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

AEYE4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.374/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$94.27M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

UBER2 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
6.152/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.472/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : AEYE

AEYE has a balanced fundamental profile.

Bull Case : UBER

The strongest argument for UBER centers on Return on Equity, EPS Growth, Market Cap. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.3% and operating margin at 13.3%. Revenue growth of 12.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : AEYE

The primary concerns for AEYE are PEG Ratio, EPS Growth, Market Cap.

Bear Case : UBER

The primary concerns for UBER are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

AEYE profiles as a turnaround stock while UBER is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

UBER carries more volatility with a beta of 1.16 — expect wider price swings.

UBER is growing revenue faster at 12.2% — sustainability is the question.

UBER generates stronger free cash flow (2.8B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

UBER scores higher overall (64/100 vs 27/100), backed by strong 17.3% margins and 12.2% revenue growth. AEYE offers better value entry with a 63.0% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

AudioEye Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - APPLICATION · USA

AudioEye, Inc. provides Internet, printing, streaming, and other media software solutions to individuals regardless of their network connection, device, location, or disabilities in the United States. The company is headquartered in Tucson, Arizona.

Uber Technologies Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - APPLICATION · USA

Uber Technologies, Inc., commonly known as Uber, is an American technology company. Its services include ride-hailing, food delivery (Uber Eats), package delivery, couriers, freight transportation, and, through a partnership with Lime, electric bicycle and motorized scooter rental. The company is based in San Francisco, California.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?