WallStSmart

AGCO Corporation (AGCO)vsCSW Industrials, Inc. (CSW)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

AGCO Corporation generates 785% more annual revenue ($10.35B vs $1.17B). CSW leads profitability with a 10.3% profit margin vs 5.2%. AGCO appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.06. CSW earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

AGCO

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.0Profit: 6.0Value: 6.3Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.26

CSW

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.7Profit: 6.5Value: 2.7Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.91
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for AGCO.

CSWSignificantly Overvalued (-71.0%)

Margin of Safety

-71.0%

Fair Value

$188.35

Current Price

$300.71

$112.36 premium

UndervaluedFair: $188.35Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

AGCO3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.0310/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

P/E RatioValuation
17.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

CSW3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
33.0%10/10

Revenue surging 33.0% year-over-year

Operating MarginProfitability
22.9%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 22.9%

EPS GrowthGrowth
25.1%8/10

Earnings expanding 25.1% YoY

Areas to Watch

AGCO3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Profit MarginProfitability
5.2%3/10

5.2% margin — thin

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-1.0%2/10

Revenue declined 1.0%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-74.4%2/10

Earnings declined 74.4%

CSW4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.914/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.842/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
40.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : AGCO

The strongest argument for AGCO centers on Debt/Equity, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 1.06 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : CSW

The strongest argument for CSW centers on Revenue Growth, Operating Margin, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 33.0% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : AGCO

The primary concerns for AGCO are Profit Margin, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : CSW

The primary concerns for CSW are Altman Z-Score, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. A P/E of 40.6x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

AGCO profiles as a value stock while CSW is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

AGCO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.09 — expect wider price swings.

CSW is growing revenue faster at 33.0% — sustainability is the question.

AGCO generates stronger free cash flow (108M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CSW scores higher overall (64/100 vs 52/100) and 33.0% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

AGCO Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA

AGCO Corporation manufactures and distributes agricultural equipment and related spare parts worldwide. The company is headquartered in Duluth, Georgia.

Visit Website →

CSW Industrials, Inc.

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY · USA

CSW Industrials, Inc. provides various industrial products in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?