WallStSmart

Akamai Technologies Inc (AKAM)vsSonos Inc (SONO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Akamai Technologies Inc generates 192% more annual revenue ($4.27B vs $1.46B). AKAM leads profitability with a 10.2% profit margin vs 1.6%. AKAM trades at a lower P/E of 45.1x. AKAM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 47/100 (D+).

AKAM

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 6.0Value: 4.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.56

SONO

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 4.0Value: 3.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.04
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

AKAMUndervalued (+11.1%)

Margin of Safety

+11.1%

Fair Value

$150.08

Current Price

$158.98

$8.90 discount

UndervaluedFair: $150.08Overvalued
SONOSignificantly Overvalued (-34.6%)

Margin of Safety

-34.6%

Fair Value

$12.26

Current Price

$15.08

$2.82 premium

UndervaluedFair: $12.26Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

AKAM0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

SONO2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
87.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 87.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.159/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

AKAM4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.584/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.564/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Debt/EquityHealth
1.203/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

SONO4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$1.88B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
6.2%3/10

ROE of 6.2% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
1.6%3/10

1.6% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : AKAM

AKAM has a balanced fundamental profile.

Bull Case : SONO

The strongest argument for SONO centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : AKAM

The primary concerns for AKAM are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. A P/E of 45.1x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : SONO

The primary concerns for SONO are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 92.8x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 1.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

SONO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.94 — expect wider price swings.

SONO is growing revenue faster at 8.4% — sustainability is the question.

AKAM generates stronger free cash flow (121M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

AKAM scores higher overall (47/100 vs 45/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Akamai Technologies Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Akamai Technologies, Inc. is a global content delivery network (CDN), cybersecurity, and cloud service company, providing web and Internet security services.

Visit Website →

Sonos Inc

TECHNOLOGY · CONSUMER ELECTRONICS · USA

Sonos, Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, and sells multi-room audio products in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Santa Barbara, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?