WallStSmart

Alarum Technologies Ltd. (ALAR)vsCrowdstrike Holdings Inc (CRWD)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc generates 13154% more annual revenue ($4.81B vs $36.30M). ALAR leads profitability with a 3.3% profit margin vs -3.4%. CRWD earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 40/100 (D).

ALAR

Hold

37

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 7.3Profit: 3.5Value: 5.7Quality: 5.0

CRWD

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 8.0Profit: 2.5Value: 4.0Quality: 4.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.01
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ALARSignificantly Overvalued (-415.4%)

Margin of Safety

-415.4%

Fair Value

$1.36

Current Price

$5.99

$4.63 premium

UndervaluedFair: $1.36Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CRWD.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ALAR1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
80.9%10/10

Revenue surging 80.9% year-over-year

CRWD2 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Market CapQuality
$99.67B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Revenue GrowthGrowth
23.3%8/10

Revenue surging 23.3% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

ALAR4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
31.5x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
13.6x4/10

Trading at 13.6x book value

Market CapQuality
$45.64M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
4.3%3/10

ROE of 4.3% — below average capital efficiency

CRWD4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
1.0%3/10

Operating margin of 1.0%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
3.372/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
22.1x2/10

Trading at 22.1x book value

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ALAR

The strongest argument for ALAR centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 80.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : CRWD

The strongest argument for CRWD centers on Market Cap, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 23.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : ALAR

The primary concerns for ALAR are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Market Cap. Thin 3.3% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : CRWD

The primary concerns for CRWD are Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ALAR profiles as a hypergrowth stock while CRWD is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

CRWD carries more volatility with a beta of 1.12 — expect wider price swings.

ALAR is growing revenue faster at 80.9% — sustainability is the question.

CRWD generates stronger free cash flow (376M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CRWD scores higher overall (40/100 vs 37/100) and 23.3% revenue growth. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Alarum Technologies Ltd.

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Alarum Technologies Ltd. provides cybersecurity and privacy solutions to consumers and enterprises in Israel, the United States, Hong Kong, the Asia Pacific, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel.

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. provides cloud solutions for endpoint and cloud workload protection in the United States, Australia, Germany, India, Israel, Romania, and the United Kingdom. The company is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?