WallStSmart

Applied Materials Inc (AMAT)vsNatera Inc (NTRA)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Applied Materials Inc generates 1123% more annual revenue ($28.21B vs $2.31B). AMAT leads profitability with a 27.8% profit margin vs -9.0%. AMAT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

AMAT

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 9.5Value: 4.3Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 4.98

NTRA

Avoid

31

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 8.0Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 4/9

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

AMAT6 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Market CapQuality
$325.89B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Return on EquityProfitability
38.9%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 39 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
75.2%10/10

Earnings expanding 75.2% YoY

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.9810/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Profit MarginProfitability
27.8%9/10

Keeps 28 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
29.9%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 29.9%

NTRA1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
39.8%10/10

Revenue surging 39.8% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

AMAT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.964/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
15.9x4/10

Trading at 15.9x book value

P/E RatioValuation
42.2x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-2.1%2/10

Revenue declined 2.1%

NTRA4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Price/BookValuation
15.8x4/10

Trading at 15.8x book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Return on EquityProfitability
-14.3%2/10

ROE of -14.3% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
-9.0%1/10

Currently unprofitable

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : AMAT

The strongest argument for AMAT centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, EPS Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 27.8% and operating margin at 29.9%.

Bull Case : NTRA

The strongest argument for NTRA centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 39.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : AMAT

The primary concerns for AMAT are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 42.2x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : NTRA

The primary concerns for NTRA are Price/Book, EPS Growth, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

AMAT profiles as a declining stock while NTRA is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

AMAT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.65 — expect wider price swings.

NTRA is growing revenue faster at 39.8% — sustainability is the question.

AMAT generates stronger free cash flow (1.0B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

AMAT scores higher overall (64/100 vs 31/100), backed by strong 27.8% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Applied Materials Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SEMICONDUCTOR EQUIPMENT & MATERIALS · USA

Applied Materials, Inc. is an American corporation that supplies equipment, services and software for the manufacture of semiconductor (integrated circuit) chips for electronics, flat panel displays for computers, smartphones and televisions, and solar products. The company also supplies equipment to produce coatings for flexible electronics, packaging and other applications. The company is headquartered in Santa Clara, California, in Silicon Valley.

Visit Website →

Natera Inc

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Natera, Inc., a diagnostic company, develops and markets molecular testing services globally. The company is headquartered in San Carlos, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?