WallStSmart

AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc (AMC)vsTKO Group Holdings, Inc. (TKO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

TKO Group Holdings, Inc. generates 1% more annual revenue ($5.30B vs $5.23B). TKO leads profitability with a 4.3% profit margin vs -10.6%. TKO appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.53. TKO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 57/100 (C).

AMC

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: -1.16

TKO

Buy

57

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 8.0Profit: 6.0Value: 2.7Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.33
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for AMC.

TKOSignificantly Overvalued (-28.8%)

Margin of Safety

-28.8%

Fair Value

$163.39

Current Price

$201.28

$37.89 premium

UndervaluedFair: $163.39Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

AMC1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Debt/EquityHealth
-5.3110/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

TKO2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
32.4%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 32.4%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
18.2%8/10

18.2% revenue growth

Areas to Watch

AMC4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Return on EquityProfitability
0.0%3/10

ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
12.222/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

TKO4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.534/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
6.8%3/10

ROE of 6.8% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
4.3%3/10

4.3% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
1.463/10

Elevated debt levels

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : AMC

The strongest argument for AMC centers on Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 14.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : TKO

The strongest argument for TKO centers on Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 18.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : AMC

The primary concerns for AMC are EPS Growth, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : TKO

The primary concerns for TKO are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 68.6x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 4.3% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

AMC profiles as a turnaround stock while TKO is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

AMC carries more volatility with a beta of 2.22 — expect wider price swings.

TKO is growing revenue faster at 18.2% — sustainability is the question.

TKO generates stronger free cash flow (675M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TKO scores higher overall (57/100 vs 48/100) and 18.2% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ENTERTAINMENT · USA

AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc., involved in the theatrical business. The company is headquartered in Leawood, Kansas.

TKO Group Holdings, Inc.

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ENTERTAINMENT · USA

TKO Group Holdings, Inc. is a sports and entertainment company. The company is headquartered in New York, New York.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?