AMN Healthcare Services Inc (AMN)vsFresenius Medical Care Corporation (FMS)
AMN
AMN Healthcare Services Inc
$31.69
+3.53%
HEALTHCARE · Cap: $1.17B
FMS
Fresenius Medical Care Corporation
$22.03
+0.46%
HEALTHCARE · Cap: $12.00B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Fresenius Medical Care Corporation generates 466% more annual revenue ($19.36B vs $3.42B). FMS leads profitability with a 4.9% profit margin vs -0.9%. FMS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.79. AMN earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 62/100 (C+).
AMN
Buy62
out of 100
Grade: C+
FMS
Buy50
out of 100
Grade: C-
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+60.2%
Fair Value
$49.13
Current Price
$31.69
$17.44 discount
Margin of Safety
+69.0%
Fair Value
$77.65
Current Price
$22.03
$55.62 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Revenue surging 99.9% year-over-year
Earnings expanding 321.3% YoY
Reasonable price relative to book value
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Growing faster than its price suggests
Areas to Watch
Expensive relative to growth rate
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
Elevated debt levels
ROE of -4.5% — below average capital efficiency
Grey zone — moderate risk
ROE of 7.1% — below average capital efficiency
4.9% margin — thin
Revenue declined 5.5%
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : AMN
The strongest argument for AMN centers on Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 99.9% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : FMS
The strongest argument for FMS centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.79 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : AMN
The primary concerns for AMN are PEG Ratio, Market Cap, Debt/Equity.
Bear Case : FMS
The primary concerns for FMS are Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Thin 4.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
AMN profiles as a hypergrowth stock while FMS is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.
FMS carries more volatility with a beta of 0.81 — expect wider price swings.
AMN is growing revenue faster at 99.9% — sustainability is the question.
AMN generates stronger free cash flow (555M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
AMN scores higher overall (62/100 vs 50/100) and 99.9% revenue growth. FMS offers better value entry with a 69.0% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
AMN Healthcare Services Inc
HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES · USA
AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. provides healthcare personnel solutions and staffing services to hospitals and healthcare facilities in the United States. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Taxas.
Visit Website →Fresenius Medical Care Corporation
HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES · USA
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA provides dialysis care and related dialysis care services in Germany, North America and internationally. The company is headquartered in Bad Homburg, Germany.
Visit Website →Compare with Other MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?