AMN Healthcare Services Inc (AMN)vsFresenius Medical Care Corporation (FMS)
AMN
AMN Healthcare Services Inc
$33.34
+0.88%
HEALTHCARE · Cap: $1.29B
FMS
Fresenius Medical Care Corporation
$22.35
+0.54%
HEALTHCARE · Cap: $12.06B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Fresenius Medical Care Corporation generates 466% more annual revenue ($19.43B vs $3.43B). FMS leads profitability with a 4.8% profit margin vs 3.1%. FMS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.73. AMN earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 62/100 (C+).
AMN
Buy62
out of 100
Grade: C+
FMS
Buy58
out of 100
Grade: C
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+59.9%
Fair Value
$48.77
Current Price
$33.34
$15.43 discount
Margin of Safety
+68.6%
Fair Value
$76.58
Current Price
$22.35
$54.23 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Earnings expanding 321.3% YoY
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Growing faster than its price suggests
Areas to Watch
Expensive relative to growth rate
2.3% revenue growth
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
3.1% margin — thin
1.4% revenue growth
Grey zone — moderate risk
ROE of 7.5% — below average capital efficiency
4.8% margin — thin
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : AMN
The strongest argument for AMN centers on EPS Growth, P/E Ratio, Price/Book.
Bull Case : FMS
The strongest argument for FMS centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.73 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : AMN
The primary concerns for AMN are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, Market Cap. Thin 3.1% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Bear Case : FMS
The primary concerns for FMS are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. Thin 4.8% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
FMS carries more volatility with a beta of 0.83 — expect wider price swings.
AMN is growing revenue faster at 2.3% — sustainability is the question.
FMS generates stronger free cash flow (620M), providing more financial flexibility.
Monitor MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.
Bottom Line
AMN scores higher overall (62/100 vs 58/100). FMS offers better value entry with a 68.6% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
AMN Healthcare Services Inc
HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES · USA
AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. provides healthcare personnel solutions and staffing services to hospitals and healthcare facilities in the United States. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Taxas.
Visit Website →Fresenius Medical Care Corporation
HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES · USA
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA provides dialysis care and related dialysis care services in Germany, North America and internationally. The company is headquartered in Bad Homburg, Germany.
Visit Website →Compare with Other MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?