WallStSmart

Amazon.com Inc (AMZN)vsRush Enterprises A Inc (RUSHA)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Amazon.com Inc generates 10619% more annual revenue ($775.68B vs $7.24B). AMZN leads profitability with a 17.4% profit margin vs 3.7%. AMZN appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.48. AMZN earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 72/100 (B).

AMZN

Strong Buy

72

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 8.7Profit: 7.0Value: 4.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.33

RUSHA

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.5Value: 4.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.34
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

AMZNSignificantly Overvalued (-59.1%)

Margin of Safety

-59.1%

Fair Value

$161.40

Current Price

$256.78

$95.38 premium

UndervaluedFair: $161.40Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for RUSHA.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

AMZN4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Market CapQuality
$2.77T10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

EPS GrowthGrowth
242.3%10/10

Earnings expanding 242.3% YoY

Return on EquityProfitability
24.5%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 25 in profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
19.6%8/10

19.6% revenue growth

RUSHA2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.3410/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
2.4x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

AMZN2 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-8.82B2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

RUSHA4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
1.1%4/10

1.1% earnings growth

Profit MarginProfitability
3.7%3/10

3.7% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
3.162/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : AMZN

The strongest argument for AMZN centers on Market Cap, EPS Growth, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.4% and operating margin at 13.7%. Revenue growth of 19.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : RUSHA

The strongest argument for RUSHA centers on Altman Z-Score, Price/Book.

Bear Case : AMZN

The primary concerns for AMZN are Piotroski F-Score, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : RUSHA

The primary concerns for RUSHA are EPS Growth, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. Thin 3.7% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

AMZN profiles as a growth stock while RUSHA is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

AMZN carries more volatility with a beta of 1.44 — expect wider price swings.

AMZN is growing revenue faster at 19.6% — sustainability is the question.

RUSHA generates stronger free cash flow (51M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

AMZN scores higher overall (72/100 vs 46/100), backed by strong 17.4% margins and 19.6% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Amazon.com Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · INTERNET RETAIL · USA

Amazon.com, Inc. is an American multinational technology company which focuses on e-commerce, cloud computing, digital streaming, and artificial intelligence. It is one of the Big Five companies in the U.S. information technology industry, along with Google, Apple, Microsoft, and Facebook. The company has been referred to as one of the most influential economic and cultural forces in the world, as well as the world's most valuable brand.

Visit Website →

Rush Enterprises A Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO & TRUCK DEALERSHIPS · USA

Rush Enterprises, Inc. is an integrated retailer of commercial vehicles and related services in the United States. The company is headquartered in New Braunfels, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?