WallStSmart

Arq Inc (ARQ)vsCECO Environmental Corp. (CECO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

CECO Environmental Corp. generates 544% more annual revenue ($774.38M vs $120.34M). CECO leads profitability with a 6.5% profit margin vs -43.7%. CECO appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.44. CECO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 54/100 (C-).

ARQ

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 5.3Profit: 2.0Value: 4.0Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.63

CECO

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 7.3Profit: 6.0Value: 7.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.92
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for ARQ.

CECOSignificantly Overvalued (-717.4%)

Margin of Safety

-717.4%

Fair Value

$9.32

Current Price

$62.08

$52.76 premium

UndervaluedFair: $9.32Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ARQ2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
0.6x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Debt/EquityHealth
0.169/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

CECO2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
35.4%10/10

Revenue surging 35.4% year-over-year

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0810/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

ARQ4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$85.27M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
11.752/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

CECO4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.924/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Profit MarginProfitability
6.5%3/10

6.5% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

P/E RatioValuation
45.3x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ARQ

The strongest argument for ARQ centers on Price/Book, Debt/Equity.

Bull Case : CECO

The strongest argument for CECO centers on Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 35.4% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.44 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : ARQ

The primary concerns for ARQ are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : CECO

The primary concerns for CECO are Altman Z-Score, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 45.3x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ARQ profiles as a turnaround stock while CECO is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

ARQ carries more volatility with a beta of 3.38 — expect wider price swings.

CECO is growing revenue faster at 35.4% — sustainability is the question.

CECO generates stronger free cash flow (7M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CECO scores higher overall (54/100 vs 40/100) and 35.4% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Arq Inc

INDUSTRIALS · POLLUTION & TREATMENT CONTROLS · USA

Arq, Inc. produces activated carbon products in North America. The company is headquartered in Greenwood Village, Colorado.

Visit Website →

CECO Environmental Corp.

INDUSTRIALS · POLLUTION & TREATMENT CONTROLS · USA

CECO Environmental Corporation. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?