WallStSmart

Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO)vsOPAL Fuels Inc (OPAL)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Atmos Energy Corporation generates 1349% more annual revenue ($4.88B vs $336.94M). ATO leads profitability with a 27.6% profit margin vs 5.7%. ATO trades at a lower P/E of 20.9x. ATO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

ATO

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.0Value: 5.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.10

OPAL

Avoid

29

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.0Value: 7.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.05
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for ATO.

OPALUndervalued (+44.4%)

Margin of Safety

+44.4%

Fair Value

$4.26

Current Price

$2.22

$2.04 discount

UndervaluedFair: $4.26Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ATO3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
39.3%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 39.3%

Profit MarginProfitability
27.6%9/10

Keeps 28 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Price/BookValuation
1.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

OPAL1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
234.4%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 234 in profit

Areas to Watch

ATO4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.064/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.6%4/10

0.6% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-280.10M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

OPAL4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
29.9x4/10

Moderate valuation

Price/BookValuation
8.2x4/10

Trading at 8.2x book value

Market CapQuality
$366.12M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
5.7%3/10

5.7% margin — thin

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ATO

The strongest argument for ATO centers on Operating Margin, Profit Margin, Price/Book. Profitability is solid with margins at 27.6% and operating margin at 39.3%.

Bull Case : OPAL

The strongest argument for OPAL centers on Return on Equity.

Bear Case : ATO

The primary concerns for ATO are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : OPAL

The primary concerns for OPAL are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Market Cap. Debt-to-equity of 54.41 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

OPAL carries more volatility with a beta of 0.77 — expect wider price swings.

ATO is growing revenue faster at 0.6% — sustainability is the question.

OPAL generates stronger free cash flow (-11M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor UTILITIES - REGULATED GAS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

ATO scores higher overall (64/100 vs 29/100), backed by strong 27.6% margins. OPAL offers better value entry with a 44.4% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Atmos Energy Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED GAS · USA

Atmos Energy Corporation, headquartered in Dallas, Texas, is one of the United States' largest natural-gas-only distributors.

OPAL Fuels Inc

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED GAS · USA

OPAL Fuels Inc. is a leading participant in the renewable natural gas (RNG) sector, specializing in the transformation of organic waste into sustainable energy solutions that contribute to a low-carbon economy. The company boasts a robust portfolio of RNG production facilities and has cultivated strategic partnerships to strengthen its market presence. With a commitment to advanced technologies and innovative practices, OPAL Fuels is well-positioned to meet the growing demand for environmentally friendly energy alternatives, underscoring its potential for significant value creation within the evolving energy landscape.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?