WallStSmart

Avista Corporation (AVA)vsSouthern Company (SO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Southern Company generates 1474% more annual revenue ($30.18B vs $1.92B). SO leads profitability with a 14.5% profit margin vs 10.7%. SO appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.53. AVA earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C).

AVA

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.5Value: 4.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 0.77

SO

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 7.0Value: 3.3Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.65
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

AVASignificantly Overvalued (-29.6%)

Margin of Safety

-29.6%

Fair Value

$32.19

Current Price

$42.42

$10.23 premium

UndervaluedFair: $32.19Overvalued
SOSignificantly Overvalued (-47.7%)

Margin of Safety

-47.7%

Fair Value

$62.70

Current Price

$92.60

$29.90 premium

UndervaluedFair: $62.70Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

AVA3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Price/BookValuation
1.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

P/E RatioValuation
16.9x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Operating MarginProfitability
23.7%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 23.7%

SO3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$102.01B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
2.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
25.8%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 25.8%

Areas to Watch

AVA4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
7.4%3/10

ROE of 7.4% — below average capital efficiency

Debt/EquityHealth
1.183/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.692/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

SO4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.532/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-0.8%2/10

Earnings declined 0.8%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-1.72B2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : AVA

The strongest argument for AVA centers on Price/Book, P/E Ratio, Operating Margin.

Bull Case : SO

The strongest argument for SO centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : AVA

The primary concerns for AVA are Return on Equity, Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : SO

The primary concerns for SO are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, EPS Growth. Debt-to-equity of 2.05 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

AVA profiles as a declining stock while SO is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

SO carries more volatility with a beta of 0.36 — expect wider price swings.

SO is growing revenue faster at 8.0% — sustainability is the question.

AVA generates stronger free cash flow (29M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

AVA scores higher overall (60/100 vs 56/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Avista Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - DIVERSIFIED · USA

Avista Corporation is a natural gas and electric utility company. The company is headquartered in Spokane, Washington.

Visit Website →

Southern Company

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

Southern Company is an American gas and electric utility holding company based in the southern United States. It is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, with executive offices also located in Birmingham, Alabama.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?