WallStSmart

Avista Corporation (AVA)vsTransAlta Corp (TAC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

TransAlta Corp generates 18% more annual revenue ($2.27B vs $1.92B). AVA leads profitability with a 11.8% profit margin vs -1.0%. AVA appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.27. AVA earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 62/100 (C+).

AVA

Buy

62

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 5.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 0.77

TAC

Hold

43

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 3.3Profit: 4.5Value: 4.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: -0.05
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

AVASignificantly Overvalued (-31.0%)

Margin of Safety

-31.0%

Fair Value

$31.86

Current Price

$36.79

$4.93 premium

UndervaluedFair: $31.86Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for TAC.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

AVA3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Price/BookValuation
1.1x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
147.9%10/10

Earnings expanding 147.9% YoY

P/E RatioValuation
13.5x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

TAC1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
33.3%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 33.3%

Areas to Watch

AVA4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.274/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.5%4/10

0.5% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
7.4%3/10

ROE of 7.4% — below average capital efficiency

Debt/EquityHealth
1.173/10

Elevated debt levels

TAC4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.982/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-12.1%2/10

ROE of -12.1% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-71.6%2/10

Earnings declined 71.6%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : AVA

The strongest argument for AVA centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth, P/E Ratio.

Bull Case : TAC

The strongest argument for TAC centers on Operating Margin. Revenue growth of 12.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : AVA

The primary concerns for AVA are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : TAC

The primary concerns for TAC are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, Return on Equity. Debt-to-equity of 2.38 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

AVA profiles as a value stock while TAC is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

TAC carries more volatility with a beta of 0.46 — expect wider price swings.

TAC is growing revenue faster at 12.5% — sustainability is the question.

TAC generates stronger free cash flow (17M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

AVA scores higher overall (62/100 vs 43/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Avista Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - DIVERSIFIED · USA

Avista Corporation is a natural gas and electric utility company. The company is headquartered in Spokane, Washington.

Visit Website →

TransAlta Corp

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

TransAlta Corporation owns, operates and develops a diverse fleet of electric power generation assets in Canada, the United States and Australia. The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?