WallStSmart

Axalta Coating Systems Ltd (AXTA)vsBHP Group Limited (BHP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

BHP Group Limited generates 957% more annual revenue ($53.99B vs $5.11B). BHP leads profitability with a 19.0% profit margin vs 7.2%. AXTA appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.04. BHP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 62/100 (C+).

AXTA

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.7Profit: 6.0Value: 4.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.89

BHP

Buy

62

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 9.0Value: 4.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.24
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

AXTASignificantly Overvalued (-48.5%)

Margin of Safety

-48.5%

Fair Value

$22.61

Current Price

$32.18

$9.57 premium

UndervaluedFair: $22.61Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for BHP.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

AXTA1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

BHP5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
Market CapQuality
$230.71B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Return on EquityProfitability
42.9%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 43 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
40.7%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 40.7%

EPS GrowthGrowth
27.5%8/10

Earnings expanding 27.5% YoY

Free Cash FlowQuality
$4.31B8/10

Generating 4.3B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

AXTA4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.044/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.894/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Profit MarginProfitability
7.2%3/10

7.2% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
1.303/10

Elevated debt levels

BHP2 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
5.952/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : AXTA

The strongest argument for AXTA centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : BHP

The strongest argument for BHP centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 19.0% and operating margin at 40.7%. Revenue growth of 10.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : AXTA

The primary concerns for AXTA are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Profit Margin.

Bear Case : BHP

The primary concerns for BHP are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

AXTA profiles as a value stock while BHP is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

AXTA carries more volatility with a beta of 1.26 — expect wider price swings.

BHP is growing revenue faster at 10.8% — sustainability is the question.

BHP generates stronger free cash flow (4.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

BHP scores higher overall (62/100 vs 49/100), backed by strong 19.0% margins and 10.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Axalta Coating Systems Ltd

BASIC MATERIALS · SPECIALTY CHEMICALS · USA

Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. manufactures, markets and distributes high performance coating systems in North America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Asia Pacific and Latin America. The company is headquartered in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

BHP Group Limited

BASIC MATERIALS · OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING · USA

BHP Group engages in the natural resources business in Australia, Europe, China, Japan, India, South Korea, the rest of Asia, North America, South America and internationally. The company is headquartered in Melbourne, Australia.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?