WallStSmart

AstraZeneca PLC (AZN)vsTarsus Pharmaceuticals Inc (TARS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

AstraZeneca PLC generates 11195% more annual revenue ($60.44B vs $535.08M). AZN leads profitability with a 17.2% profit margin vs -9.0%. AZN earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

AZN

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 8.5Value: 6.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.48

TARS

Avoid

32

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 8.0Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.18
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

AZNUndervalued (+8.2%)

Margin of Safety

+8.2%

Fair Value

$194.77

Current Price

$185.95

$8.82 discount

UndervaluedFair: $194.77Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for TARS.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

AZN4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Market CapQuality
$282.69B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Return on EquityProfitability
21.9%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 22 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
27.9%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 27.9%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.82B8/10

Generating 1.8B in free cash flow

TARS2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
106.9%10/10

Revenue surging 106.9% year-over-year

Debt/EquityHealth
0.259/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

AZN2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
27.5x4/10

Moderate valuation

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.482/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

TARS4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Return on EquityProfitability
-13.8%2/10

ROE of -13.8% — below average capital efficiency

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-30.47M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.182/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : AZN

The strongest argument for AZN centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.2% and operating margin at 27.9%. Revenue growth of 12.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : TARS

The strongest argument for TARS centers on Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 106.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : AZN

The primary concerns for AZN are P/E Ratio, Altman Z-Score.

Bear Case : TARS

The primary concerns for TARS are EPS Growth, Return on Equity, Free Cash Flow.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

AZN profiles as a mature stock while TARS is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

TARS carries more volatility with a beta of 0.51 — expect wider price swings.

TARS is growing revenue faster at 106.9% — sustainability is the question.

AZN generates stronger free cash flow (1.8B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

AZN scores higher overall (64/100 vs 32/100), backed by strong 17.2% margins and 12.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

AstraZeneca PLC

HEALTHCARE · DRUG MANUFACTURERS - GENERAL · USA

AstraZeneca PLC discovers, develops, manufactures and markets prescription drugs in the areas of oncology, cardiovascular, renal and metabolism, respiratory, infections, neuroscience and gastroenterology worldwide. The company is headquartered in Cambridge, the United Kingdom.

Tarsus Pharmaceuticals Inc

HEALTHCARE · BIOTECHNOLOGY · USA

Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company, focuses on the development and commercialization of new therapeutic candidates for ophthalmic conditions. The company is headquartered in Irvine, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?