Alibaba Group Holding Ltd (BABA)vsBoot Barn Holdings Inc (BOOT)
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
$109.30
+0.68%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $281.47B
BOOT
Boot Barn Holdings Inc
$144.39
+2.64%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $4.62B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd generates 44494% more annual revenue ($1.04T vs $2.34B). BOOT leads profitability with a 10.3% profit margin vs 7.0%. BABA appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.52. BOOT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).
BABA
Buy55
out of 100
Grade: C-
BOOT
Strong Buy67
out of 100
Grade: B-
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+58.3%
Fair Value
$365.09
Current Price
$109.30
$255.79 discount
Margin of Safety
-66.7%
Fair Value
$113.78
Current Price
$144.39
$30.61 premium
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Mega-cap, among the largest globally
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Growing faster than its price suggests
Reasonable price relative to book value
17.7% revenue growth
Earnings expanding 31.6% YoY
Areas to Watch
Moderate valuation
ROE of 7.0% — below average capital efficiency
7.0% margin — thin
Weak financial health signals
Expensive relative to growth rate
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : BABA
The strongest argument for BABA centers on Market Cap, Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.52 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : BOOT
The strongest argument for BOOT centers on Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 17.7% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bear Case : BABA
The primary concerns for BABA are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Profit Margin.
Bear Case : BOOT
The primary concerns for BOOT are PEG Ratio.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
BABA profiles as a value stock while BOOT is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.
BOOT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.70 — expect wider price swings.
BOOT is growing revenue faster at 17.7% — sustainability is the question.
BOOT generates stronger free cash flow (33M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
BOOT scores higher overall (67/100 vs 55/100) and 17.7% revenue growth. BABA offers better value entry with a 58.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · INTERNET RETAIL · USA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited, also known as Alibaba Group and Alibaba.com, is a Chinese multinational technology company specializing in e-commerce, retail, Internet, and technology. Founded on 28 June 1999 in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, the company provides consumer-to-consumer (C2C), business-to-consumer (B2C), and business-to-business (B2B) sales services via web portals, as well as electronic payment services, shopping search engines and cloud computing services. It owns and operates a diverse portfolio of companies around the world in numerous business sectors.
Boot Barn Holdings Inc
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL RETAIL · USA
Boot Barn Holdings, Inc., a lifestyle retail chain, operates specialty retail stores in the United States. The company is headquartered in Irvine, California.
Compare with Other INTERNET RETAIL Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?