Alibaba Group Holding Ltd (BABA)vsMEDIFAST INC (MED)
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
$131.88
+1.11%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $321.85B
MED
MEDIFAST INC
$10.87
-0.46%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $118.70M
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd generates 263450% more annual revenue ($1.02T vs $385.79M). BABA leads profitability with a 8.9% profit margin vs -4.8%. BABA appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.80. BABA earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (C-).
BABA
Buy50
out of 100
Grade: C-
MED
Hold45
out of 100
Grade: D
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+72.9%
Fair Value
$562.19
Current Price
$131.88
$430.31 discount
Intrinsic value data unavailable for MED.
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Mega-cap, among the largest globally
Growing faster than its price suggests
Reasonable price relative to book value
Reasonable price relative to book value
Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk
Growing faster than its price suggests
Areas to Watch
1.7% revenue growth
Earnings declined 70.9%
Negative free cash flow — burning cash
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
Weak financial health signals
ROE of -9.1% — below average capital efficiency
Revenue declined 36.9%
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : BABA
The strongest argument for BABA centers on Market Cap, PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.80 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : MED
The strongest argument for MED centers on Price/Book, Altman Z-Score, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.97 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : BABA
The primary concerns for BABA are Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, Free Cash Flow.
Bear Case : MED
The primary concerns for MED are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
BABA profiles as a value stock while MED is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.
MED carries more volatility with a beta of 0.56 — expect wider price swings.
BABA is growing revenue faster at 1.7% — sustainability is the question.
MED generates stronger free cash flow (-7M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
BABA scores higher overall (50/100 vs 45/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · INTERNET RETAIL · USA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited, also known as Alibaba Group and Alibaba.com, is a Chinese multinational technology company specializing in e-commerce, retail, Internet, and technology. Founded on 28 June 1999 in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, the company provides consumer-to-consumer (C2C), business-to-consumer (B2C), and business-to-business (B2B) sales services via web portals, as well as electronic payment services, shopping search engines and cloud computing services. It owns and operates a diverse portfolio of companies around the world in numerous business sectors.
MEDIFAST INC
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · PERSONAL SERVICES · USA
Medifast, Inc. manufactures and distributes weight loss, weight management, healthy living products, and other consumable health and nutrition products in the United States and Asia-Pacific. The company is headquartered in Baltimore, Maryland.
Visit Website →Compare with Other INTERNET RETAIL Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?