WallStSmart

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd (BABA)vsPolaris Industries Inc (PII)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd generates 13727% more annual revenue ($1.02T vs $7.35B). BABA leads profitability with a 8.9% profit margin vs -6.1%. BABA appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.80. BABA earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (C-).

BABA

Buy

50

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.0Profit: 6.0Value: 8.0Quality: 5.8
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.39

PII

Avoid

34

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 3.3Profit: 2.5Value: 5.7Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 3/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

BABAUndervalued (+72.9%)

Margin of Safety

+72.9%

Fair Value

$562.19

Current Price

$130.43

$431.76 discount

UndervaluedFair: $562.19Overvalued
PIIUndervalued (+62.9%)

Margin of Safety

+62.9%

Fair Value

$180.06

Current Price

$67.22

$112.84 discount

UndervaluedFair: $180.06Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BABA3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Market CapQuality
$321.85B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

PEG RatioValuation
0.808/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

PII0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

Areas to Watch

BABA3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.7%4/10

1.7% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
-70.9%2/10

Earnings declined 70.9%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-32.37B2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

PII4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
3.302/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-44.9%2/10

ROE of -44.9% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-89.6%2/10

Earnings declined 89.6%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BABA

The strongest argument for BABA centers on Market Cap, PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.80 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : PII

PII has a balanced fundamental profile.

Bear Case : BABA

The primary concerns for BABA are Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : PII

The primary concerns for PII are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BABA profiles as a value stock while PII is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

PII carries more volatility with a beta of 1.18 — expect wider price swings.

PII is growing revenue faster at 7.5% — sustainability is the question.

PII generates stronger free cash flow (-350M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

BABA scores higher overall (50/100 vs 34/100). PII offers better value entry with a 62.9% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · INTERNET RETAIL · USA

Alibaba Group Holding Limited, also known as Alibaba Group and Alibaba.com, is a Chinese multinational technology company specializing in e-commerce, retail, Internet, and technology. Founded on 28 June 1999 in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, the company provides consumer-to-consumer (C2C), business-to-consumer (B2C), and business-to-business (B2B) sales services via web portals, as well as electronic payment services, shopping search engines and cloud computing services. It owns and operates a diverse portfolio of companies around the world in numerous business sectors.

Polaris Industries Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RECREATIONAL VEHICLES · USA

Polaris Inc. designs, designs, manufactures and markets motor sports vehicles worldwide. The company is headquartered in Medina, Minnesota.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?