WallStSmart

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd (BABA)vsCarParts.Com Inc (PRTS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd generates 185598% more annual revenue ($1.02T vs $547.52M). BABA leads profitability with a 8.9% profit margin vs -9.2%. BABA appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.80. BABA earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (C-).

BABA

Buy

50

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.0Profit: 6.0Value: 8.0Quality: 5.8
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.39

PRTS

Avoid

30

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 2.0Value: 4.0Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

BABAUndervalued (+72.9%)

Margin of Safety

+72.9%

Fair Value

$562.19

Current Price

$130.43

$431.76 discount

UndervaluedFair: $562.19Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for PRTS.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BABA3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Market CapQuality
$321.85B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

PEG RatioValuation
0.808/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

PRTS1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.2x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

BABA3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.7%4/10

1.7% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
-70.9%2/10

Earnings declined 70.9%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-32.37B2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

PRTS4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Market CapQuality
$72.90M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

PEG RatioValuation
3.712/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-72.8%2/10

ROE of -72.8% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-9.8%2/10

Revenue declined 9.8%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BABA

The strongest argument for BABA centers on Market Cap, PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.80 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : PRTS

The strongest argument for PRTS centers on Price/Book.

Bear Case : BABA

The primary concerns for BABA are Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : PRTS

The primary concerns for PRTS are Market Cap, PEG Ratio, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BABA profiles as a value stock while PRTS is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

PRTS carries more volatility with a beta of 0.78 — expect wider price swings.

BABA is growing revenue faster at 1.7% — sustainability is the question.

PRTS generates stronger free cash flow (-13M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

BABA scores higher overall (50/100 vs 30/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · INTERNET RETAIL · USA

Alibaba Group Holding Limited, also known as Alibaba Group and Alibaba.com, is a Chinese multinational technology company specializing in e-commerce, retail, Internet, and technology. Founded on 28 June 1999 in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, the company provides consumer-to-consumer (C2C), business-to-consumer (B2C), and business-to-business (B2B) sales services via web portals, as well as electronic payment services, shopping search engines and cloud computing services. It owns and operates a diverse portfolio of companies around the world in numerous business sectors.

CarParts.Com Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO PARTS · USA

CarParts.com, Inc. is an online provider of auto parts and accessories in the United States and the Philippines. The company is headquartered in Torrance, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?