WallStSmart

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd (BABA)vsQVC Group Inc (QVCGA)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd generates 11221% more annual revenue ($1.04T vs $9.23B). BABA leads profitability with a 7.0% profit margin vs -26.4%. BABA appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.52. BABA earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 55/100 (C-).

BABA

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 4.5Value: 8.0Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.02

QVCGA

Hold

39

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 3.5Value: 4.0Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

BABAUndervalued (+58.3%)

Margin of Safety

+58.3%

Fair Value

$365.09

Current Price

$109.30

$255.79 discount

UndervaluedFair: $365.09Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for QVCGA.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BABA4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Market CapQuality
$281.47B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Debt/EquityHealth
0.259/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

PEG RatioValuation
0.528/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

QVCGA0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

Areas to Watch

BABA4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
25.6x4/10

Moderate valuation

Return on EquityProfitability
7.0%3/10

ROE of 7.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
7.0%3/10

7.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

QVCGA4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$6.59M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
0.0%3/10

ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency

Operating MarginProfitability
4.0%3/10

Operating margin of 4.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BABA

The strongest argument for BABA centers on Market Cap, Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.52 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : QVCGA

QVCGA has a balanced fundamental profile.

Bear Case : BABA

The primary concerns for BABA are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Profit Margin.

Bear Case : QVCGA

The primary concerns for QVCGA are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BABA profiles as a value stock while QVCGA is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

QVCGA carries more volatility with a beta of 2.87 — expect wider price swings.

BABA is growing revenue faster at 8.6% — sustainability is the question.

QVCGA generates stronger free cash flow (187M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

BABA scores higher overall (55/100 vs 39/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · INTERNET RETAIL · USA

Alibaba Group Holding Limited, also known as Alibaba Group and Alibaba.com, is a Chinese multinational technology company specializing in e-commerce, retail, Internet, and technology. Founded on 28 June 1999 in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, the company provides consumer-to-consumer (C2C), business-to-consumer (B2C), and business-to-business (B2B) sales services via web portals, as well as electronic payment services, shopping search engines and cloud computing services. It owns and operates a diverse portfolio of companies around the world in numerous business sectors.

QVC Group Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · INTERNET RETAIL · USA

Qurate Retail, Inc., engages in the video and online commerce industries in North America, Europe, and Asia. The company is headquartered in Englewood, Colorado.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?