WallStSmart

Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM)vsEquus Total Return Closed Fund (EQS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. generates 350738% more annual revenue ($4.82B vs $1.37M). BAM leads profitability with a 51.6% profit margin vs 0.0%. BAM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 66/100 (B-).

BAM

Strong Buy

66

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.7Profit: 9.0Value: 5.0Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 3/9

EQS

Avoid

21

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 2.5Value: 5.0Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 2/9

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BAM5 strengths · Avg: 9.6/10
Profit MarginProfitability
51.6%10/10

Keeps 52 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
67.9%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 67.9%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
31.1%10/10

Revenue surging 31.1% year-over-year

Market CapQuality
$79.93B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
22.3%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 22 in profit

EQS2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.1x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0710/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

BAM4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
31.7x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
9.9x4/10

Trading at 9.9x book value

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-20.7%2/10

Earnings declined 20.7%

EQS4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Market CapQuality
$18.02M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
0.0%3/10

0.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-61.5%2/10

ROE of -61.5% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BAM

The strongest argument for BAM centers on Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 51.6% and operating margin at 67.9%. Revenue growth of 31.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : EQS

The strongest argument for EQS centers on Price/Book, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : BAM

The primary concerns for BAM are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : EQS

The primary concerns for EQS are Market Cap, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BAM profiles as a growth stock while EQS is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

BAM carries more volatility with a beta of 1.25 — expect wider price swings.

BAM is growing revenue faster at 31.1% — sustainability is the question.

Monitor ASSET MANAGEMENT industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

BAM scores higher overall (66/100 vs 21/100), backed by strong 51.6% margins and 31.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.

FINANCIAL SERVICES · ASSET MANAGEMENT · USA

Brookfield Asset Management is a leading global alternative asset manager and one of the largest investors in real assets.

Visit Website →

Equus Total Return Closed Fund

FINANCIAL SERVICES · ASSET MANAGEMENT · USA

Equus Total Return Closed Fund (EQS) is a closed-end investment company dedicated to delivering long-term capital appreciation through strategic investments in distressed and undervalued equity and debt securities. The Fund employs a disciplined investment approach, leveraging unique market opportunities and expert collaboration to enhance return potential. By constructing a diversified portfolio tailored to navigate complex turnaround situations, EQS offers institutional investors a robust platform for capital deployment while emphasizing rigorous risk management practices.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?