Brookfield Asset Management Inc (BAM)vsEquus Total Return Closed Fund (EQS)
BAM
Brookfield Asset Management Inc
$42.87
-1.08%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $70.28B
EQS
Equus Total Return Closed Fund
$1.83
0.00%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $23.18M
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Brookfield Asset Management Inc generates 349718% more annual revenue ($4.82B vs $1.38M). BAM leads profitability with a 51.6% profit margin vs 0.0%. BAM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 66/100 (B-).
BAM
Strong Buy66
out of 100
Grade: B-
EQS
Avoid25
out of 100
Grade: F
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
-400.1%
Fair Value
$10.47
Current Price
$42.87
$32.40 premium
Intrinsic value data unavailable for EQS.
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Keeps 52 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Strong operational efficiency at 67.9%
Revenue surging 31.1% year-over-year
Large-cap with strong market position
Every $100 of equity generates 22 in profit
Reasonable price relative to book value
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Areas to Watch
Moderate valuation
Trading at 8.5x book value
Weak financial health signals
Earnings declined 20.7%
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
0.0% margin — thin
Weak financial health signals
ROE of -44.7% — below average capital efficiency
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : BAM
The strongest argument for BAM centers on Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 51.6% and operating margin at 67.9%. Revenue growth of 31.1% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : EQS
The strongest argument for EQS centers on Price/Book, Debt/Equity.
Bear Case : BAM
The primary concerns for BAM are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Piotroski F-Score.
Bear Case : EQS
The primary concerns for EQS are Market Cap, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
BAM profiles as a growth stock while EQS is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.
BAM carries more volatility with a beta of 1.29 — expect wider price swings.
BAM is growing revenue faster at 31.1% — sustainability is the question.
BAM generates stronger free cash flow (706M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
BAM scores higher overall (66/100 vs 25/100), backed by strong 51.6% margins and 31.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Brookfield Asset Management Inc
FINANCIAL SERVICES · ASSET MANAGEMENT · USA
Brookfield Asset Management is a leading global alternative asset manager and one of the largest investors in real assets.
Visit Website →Equus Total Return Closed Fund
FINANCIAL SERVICES · ASSET MANAGEMENT · USA
Equus Total Return Closed Fund (EQS) is a closed-end investment company focused on achieving long-term capital appreciation through investments in distressed and undervalued equity and debt securities. The Fund leverages unique market opportunities and collaborates with industry experts to enhance return potential while employing a disciplined investment strategy. By diversifying its portfolio to successfully navigate turnaround situations, EQS provides institutional investors with a strategic platform for engaging in complex investments while prioritizing effective risk management.
Compare with Other ASSET MANAGEMENT Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?