Brookfield Asset Management Inc (BAM)vsGladstone Capital Corporation (GLAD)
BAM
Brookfield Asset Management Inc
$42.87
-1.08%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $70.28B
GLAD
Gladstone Capital Corporation
$17.37
+1.40%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $396.96M
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Brookfield Asset Management Inc generates 5155% more annual revenue ($4.82B vs $91.67M). BAM leads profitability with a 51.6% profit margin vs 38.9%. BAM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.48. BAM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 66/100 (B-).
BAM
Strong Buy66
out of 100
Grade: B-
GLAD
Buy56
out of 100
Grade: C
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
-400.1%
Fair Value
$10.47
Current Price
$42.87
$32.40 premium
Margin of Safety
-74.9%
Fair Value
$10.74
Current Price
$17.37
$6.63 premium
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Keeps 52 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Strong operational efficiency at 67.9%
Revenue surging 31.1% year-over-year
Large-cap with strong market position
Every $100 of equity generates 22 in profit
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Keeps 39 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Strong operational efficiency at 73.1%
Areas to Watch
Moderate valuation
Trading at 8.5x book value
Weak financial health signals
Earnings declined 20.7%
Expensive relative to growth rate
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
ROE of 7.2% — below average capital efficiency
Earnings declined 80.1%
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : BAM
The strongest argument for BAM centers on Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 51.6% and operating margin at 67.9%. Revenue growth of 31.1% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : GLAD
The strongest argument for GLAD centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 38.9% and operating margin at 73.1%. Revenue growth of 11.6% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bear Case : BAM
The primary concerns for BAM are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Piotroski F-Score.
Bear Case : GLAD
The primary concerns for GLAD are PEG Ratio, Market Cap, Return on Equity.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
BAM profiles as a growth stock while GLAD is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.
BAM carries more volatility with a beta of 1.29 — expect wider price swings.
BAM is growing revenue faster at 31.1% — sustainability is the question.
BAM generates stronger free cash flow (706M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
BAM scores higher overall (66/100 vs 56/100), backed by strong 51.6% margins and 31.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Brookfield Asset Management Inc
FINANCIAL SERVICES · ASSET MANAGEMENT · USA
Brookfield Asset Management is a leading global alternative asset manager and one of the largest investors in real assets.
Visit Website →Gladstone Capital Corporation
FINANCIAL SERVICES · ASSET MANAGEMENT · USA
Gladstone Capital Corporation (GLAD) is a publicly traded business development company that specializes in providing debt and equity financing to lower middle-market businesses, facilitating their growth and expansion. The company employs a disciplined investment strategy that emphasizes capital preservation while delivering attractive risk-adjusted returns through tailored financing solutions including term loans and equity investments. Leveraging the extensive expertise of its management team, GLAD navigates diverse industries and emerging market trends, positioning itself for sustained performance in the evolving finance landscape. With a commitment to fostering long-term value creation, Gladstone Capital stands as a strategic partner for businesses seeking innovative financing solutions.
Compare with Other ASSET MANAGEMENT Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?