Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM)vsNoah Holdings Ltd (NOAH)
BAM
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.
$47.26
-1.30%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $75.49B
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd
$8.14
-0.37%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $578.68M
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. generates 120% more annual revenue ($5.74B vs $2.61B). BAM leads profitability with a 48.9% profit margin vs 22.5%. NOAH appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.75. BAM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 77/100 (B+).
BAM
Strong Buy77
out of 100
Grade: B+
NOAH
Strong Buy76
out of 100
Grade: B+
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Keeps 49 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Strong operational efficiency at 68.7%
Revenue surging 60.8% year-over-year
Large-cap with strong market position
Earnings expanding 47.4% YoY
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Strong operational efficiency at 34.8%
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk
Keeps 23 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Areas to Watch
Moderate valuation
Trading at 10.1x book value
Grey zone — moderate risk
ROE of 6.0% — below average capital efficiency
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
ROE of 6.3% — below average capital efficiency
Revenue declined 1.5%
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : BAM
The strongest argument for BAM centers on Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 48.9% and operating margin at 68.7%. Revenue growth of 60.8% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : NOAH
The strongest argument for NOAH centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 22.5% and operating margin at 34.8%. PEG of 0.75 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : BAM
The primary concerns for BAM are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Altman Z-Score. Debt-to-equity of 5.69 is elevated, increasing financial risk.
Bear Case : NOAH
The primary concerns for NOAH are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
BAM profiles as a growth stock while NOAH is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.
BAM carries more volatility with a beta of 1.26 — expect wider price swings.
BAM is growing revenue faster at 60.8% — sustainability is the question.
Monitor ASSET MANAGEMENT industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.
Bottom Line
BAM scores higher overall (77/100 vs 76/100), backed by strong 48.9% margins and 60.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.
FINANCIAL SERVICES · ASSET MANAGEMENT · USA
Brookfield Asset Management is a leading global alternative asset manager and one of the largest investors in real assets.
Visit Website →Noah Holdings Ltd
FINANCIAL SERVICES · ASSET MANAGEMENT · China
Noah Holdings Limited, is a provider of wealth and asset management services with a focus on investment and asset allocation services for high-net-worth individuals and companies in mainland China, Hong Kong and internationally. The company is headquartered in Shanghai, the People's Republic of China.
Compare with Other ASSET MANAGEMENT Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?