Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM)vsSLR Investment Corp (SLRC)
BAM
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.
$46.70
-0.32%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $76.95B
SLRC
SLR Investment Corp
$12.26
-2.74%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $704.85M
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. generates 2264% more annual revenue ($5.07B vs $214.65M). BAM leads profitability with a 49.7% profit margin vs 41.8%. BAM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.46. BAM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 68/100 (B-).
BAM
Strong Buy68
out of 100
Grade: B-
SLRC
Buy53
out of 100
Grade: C-
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Every $100 of equity generates 33 in profit
Keeps 50 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Strong operational efficiency at 64.5%
Large-cap with strong market position
Revenue surging 23.8% year-over-year
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Keeps 42 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Strong operational efficiency at 69.5%
Areas to Watch
Premium valuation, high expectations priced in
Trading at 9.9x book value
Grey zone — moderate risk
Weak financial health signals
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
Elevated debt levels
Weak financial health signals
Expensive relative to growth rate
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : BAM
The strongest argument for BAM centers on Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 49.7% and operating margin at 64.5%. Revenue growth of 23.8% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : SLRC
The strongest argument for SLRC centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 41.8% and operating margin at 69.5%.
Bear Case : BAM
The primary concerns for BAM are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Altman Z-Score.
Bear Case : SLRC
The primary concerns for SLRC are Market Cap, Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
BAM profiles as a growth stock while SLRC is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.
BAM carries more volatility with a beta of 1.25 — expect wider price swings.
BAM is growing revenue faster at 23.8% — sustainability is the question.
BAM generates stronger free cash flow (339M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
BAM scores higher overall (68/100 vs 53/100), backed by strong 49.7% margins and 23.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.
FINANCIAL SERVICES · ASSET MANAGEMENT · USA
Brookfield Asset Management is a leading global alternative asset manager and one of the largest investors in real assets.
Visit Website →SLR Investment Corp
FINANCIAL SERVICES · ASSET MANAGEMENT · USA
Solar Capital Ltd. is a business development company specializing in secured debt (unitranche first lien and second lien), subordinated (unsecured) debt, minority equity and income-oriented strategic controlling capital investments in leveraged market companies. half.
Visit Website →Compare with Other ASSET MANAGEMENT Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?