Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM)vsSLR Investment Corp (SLRC)
BAM
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.
$46.06
+1.41%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $75.49B
SLRC
SLR Investment Corp
$12.00
-2.04%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $654.66M
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. generates 2638% more annual revenue ($5.74B vs $209.56M). BAM leads profitability with a 48.9% profit margin vs 35.2%. BAM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.05. BAM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 77/100 (B+).
BAM
Strong Buy77
out of 100
Grade: B+
SLRC
Buy53
out of 100
Grade: C-
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Keeps 49 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Strong operational efficiency at 68.7%
Revenue surging 60.8% year-over-year
Large-cap with strong market position
Earnings expanding 47.4% YoY
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Keeps 35 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Strong operational efficiency at 70.8%
Areas to Watch
Moderate valuation
Trading at 9.8x book value
Grey zone — moderate risk
ROE of 6.0% — below average capital efficiency
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
ROE of 7.5% — below average capital efficiency
Elevated debt levels
Weak financial health signals
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : BAM
The strongest argument for BAM centers on Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 48.9% and operating margin at 68.7%. Revenue growth of 60.8% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : SLRC
The strongest argument for SLRC centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 35.2% and operating margin at 70.8%.
Bear Case : BAM
The primary concerns for BAM are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Altman Z-Score. Debt-to-equity of 5.69 is elevated, increasing financial risk.
Bear Case : SLRC
The primary concerns for SLRC are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Debt/Equity.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
BAM profiles as a growth stock while SLRC is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.
BAM carries more volatility with a beta of 1.26 — expect wider price swings.
BAM is growing revenue faster at 60.8% — sustainability is the question.
BAM generates stronger free cash flow (393M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
BAM scores higher overall (77/100 vs 53/100), backed by strong 48.9% margins and 60.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.
FINANCIAL SERVICES · ASSET MANAGEMENT · USA
Brookfield Asset Management is a leading global alternative asset manager and one of the largest investors in real assets.
Visit Website →SLR Investment Corp
FINANCIAL SERVICES · ASSET MANAGEMENT · USA
Solar Capital Ltd. is a business development company specializing in secured debt (unitranche first lien and second lien), subordinated (unsecured) debt, minority equity and income-oriented strategic controlling capital investments in leveraged market companies. half.
Visit Website →Compare with Other ASSET MANAGEMENT Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?