WallStSmart

Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM)vsTrane Technologies plc (TT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Trane Technologies plc generates 326% more annual revenue ($21.60B vs $5.07B). BAM leads profitability with a 49.7% profit margin vs 13.4%. BAM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.46. BAM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 68/100 (B-).

BAM

Strong Buy

68

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 7.3Profit: 9.5Value: 5.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.97

TT

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 8.0Value: 4.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 7/9Altman Z: 2.77

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BAM5 strengths · Avg: 9.4/10
Return on EquityProfitability
33.0%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 33 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
49.7%10/10

Keeps 50 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
64.5%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 64.5%

Market CapQuality
$76.95B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Revenue GrowthGrowth
23.8%8/10

Revenue surging 23.8% year-over-year

TT2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
33.6%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 34 in profit

Market CapQuality
$104.46B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

BAM4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
P/E RatioValuation
30.9x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
9.9x4/10

Trading at 9.9x book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.974/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

TT4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.014/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
36.1x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
11.9x4/10

Trading at 11.9x book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
-2.1%2/10

Earnings declined 2.1%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BAM

The strongest argument for BAM centers on Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 49.7% and operating margin at 64.5%. Revenue growth of 23.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : TT

The strongest argument for TT centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap.

Bear Case : BAM

The primary concerns for BAM are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Altman Z-Score.

Bear Case : TT

The primary concerns for TT are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BAM profiles as a growth stock while TT is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

BAM carries more volatility with a beta of 1.25 — expect wider price swings.

BAM is growing revenue faster at 23.8% — sustainability is the question.

TT generates stronger free cash flow (542M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

BAM scores higher overall (68/100 vs 52/100), backed by strong 49.7% margins and 23.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.

FINANCIAL SERVICES · ASSET MANAGEMENT · USA

Brookfield Asset Management is a leading global alternative asset manager and one of the largest investors in real assets.

Visit Website →

Trane Technologies plc

INDUSTRIALS · BUILDING PRODUCTS & EQUIPMENT · USA

Trane Technologies plc is an American Irish domiciled diversified industrial manufacturing company. It is headquartered near Dublin, Ireland.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?