WallStSmart

Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM)vsTotalEnergies SE ADR (TTE)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

TotalEnergies SE ADR generates 3526% more annual revenue ($183.96B vs $5.07B). BAM leads profitability with a 49.7% profit margin vs 8.2%. TTE appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.72. TTE earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 72/100 (B).

BAM

Strong Buy

68

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 7.3Profit: 9.5Value: 5.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.97

TTE

Strong Buy

72

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 5.3Profit: 6.5Value: 7.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.91

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BAM5 strengths · Avg: 9.4/10
Return on EquityProfitability
33.0%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 33 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
49.7%10/10

Keeps 50 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
64.5%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 64.5%

Market CapQuality
$76.95B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Revenue GrowthGrowth
23.8%8/10

Revenue surging 23.8% year-over-year

TTE6 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
57.1%10/10

Earnings expanding 57.1% YoY

Market CapQuality
$195.51B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

PEG RatioValuation
0.728/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
13.1x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
20.3%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.3%

Areas to Watch

BAM4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
P/E RatioValuation
30.9x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
9.9x4/10

Trading at 9.9x book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.974/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

TTE4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.4%4/10

3.4% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.914/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-1.24B2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BAM

The strongest argument for BAM centers on Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 49.7% and operating margin at 64.5%. Revenue growth of 23.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : TTE

The strongest argument for TTE centers on EPS Growth, Market Cap, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.72 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : BAM

The primary concerns for BAM are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Altman Z-Score.

Bear Case : TTE

The primary concerns for TTE are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BAM profiles as a growth stock while TTE is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

BAM carries more volatility with a beta of 1.25 — expect wider price swings.

BAM is growing revenue faster at 23.8% — sustainability is the question.

BAM generates stronger free cash flow (339M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TTE scores higher overall (72/100 vs 68/100). Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.

FINANCIAL SERVICES · ASSET MANAGEMENT · USA

Brookfield Asset Management is a leading global alternative asset manager and one of the largest investors in real assets.

Visit Website →

TotalEnergies SE ADR

ENERGY · OIL & GAS INTEGRATED · USA

TotalEnergies SE is a global integrated oil and gas company. The company is headquartered in Paris, France.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?