WallStSmart

Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM)vsUniversal Health Services Inc (UHS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Universal Health Services Inc generates 269% more annual revenue ($17.76B vs $4.82B). BAM leads profitability with a 51.6% profit margin vs 8.6%. UHS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.18. UHS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 72/100 (B).

BAM

Strong Buy

66

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.7Profit: 9.0Value: 5.0Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 3/9

UHS

Strong Buy

72

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 6.7Profit: 7.0Value: 8.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.97
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for BAM.

UHSUndervalued (+41.1%)

Margin of Safety

+41.1%

Fair Value

$393.00

Current Price

$168.23

$224.77 discount

UndervaluedFair: $393.00Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BAM5 strengths · Avg: 9.6/10
Profit MarginProfitability
51.6%10/10

Keeps 52 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
67.9%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 67.9%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
31.1%10/10

Revenue surging 31.1% year-over-year

Market CapQuality
$79.93B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
22.3%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 22 in profit

UHS3 strengths · Avg: 9.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
7.1x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Return on EquityProfitability
21.4%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 21 in profit

Areas to Watch

BAM4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
31.7x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
9.9x4/10

Trading at 9.9x book value

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-20.7%2/10

Earnings declined 20.7%

UHS0 concerns · Avg: 0/10

No major concerns identified

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BAM

The strongest argument for BAM centers on Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 51.6% and operating margin at 67.9%. Revenue growth of 31.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : UHS

The strongest argument for UHS centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Return on Equity. PEG of 1.18 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : BAM

The primary concerns for BAM are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : UHS

No major red flags identified for UHS, but monitor valuation.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BAM profiles as a growth stock while UHS is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

BAM carries more volatility with a beta of 1.25 — expect wider price swings.

BAM is growing revenue faster at 31.1% — sustainability is the question.

Monitor ASSET MANAGEMENT industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

UHS scores higher overall (72/100 vs 66/100). Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.

FINANCIAL SERVICES · ASSET MANAGEMENT · USA

Brookfield Asset Management is a leading global alternative asset manager and one of the largest investors in real assets.

Visit Website →

Universal Health Services Inc

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES · USA

UnitedHealth Group Incorporated is an American for-profit multinational managed healthcare and insurance company based in Minnetonka, Minnesota. It offers health care products and insurance services.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?