WallStSmart

Qilian International Holding Group Limited (BGM)vsTeva Pharma Industries Ltd ADR (TEVA)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Teva Pharma Industries Ltd ADR generates 36046% more annual revenue ($17.32B vs $47.90M). TEVA leads profitability with a 4.1% profit margin vs -44.2%. TEVA earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 49/100 (D+).

BGM

Hold

36

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 5.3Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 5.61

TEVA

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.0Value: 5.0Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 0.28

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BGM4 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.1x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
69.8%10/10

Revenue surging 69.8% year-over-year

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0010/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
5.6110/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

TEVA2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
72.2%10/10

Earnings expanding 72.2% YoY

PEG RatioValuation
0.678/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Areas to Watch

BGM4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$105.36M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-0.8%2/10

ROE of -0.8% — below average capital efficiency

TEVA4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
4.1%3/10

4.1% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.0%3/10

Operating margin of 4.0%

P/E RatioValuation
61.3x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-0.8%2/10

Revenue declined 0.8%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BGM

The strongest argument for BGM centers on Price/Book, Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 69.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : TEVA

The strongest argument for TEVA centers on EPS Growth, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.67 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : BGM

The primary concerns for BGM are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : TEVA

The primary concerns for TEVA are Profit Margin, Operating Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 61.3x leaves little room for execution misses. Debt-to-equity of 2.18 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BGM profiles as a hypergrowth stock while TEVA is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

BGM carries more volatility with a beta of 1.46 — expect wider price swings.

BGM is growing revenue faster at 69.8% — sustainability is the question.

TEVA generates stronger free cash flow (307M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TEVA scores higher overall (49/100 vs 36/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Qilian International Holding Group Limited

HEALTHCARE · DRUG MANUFACTURERS - SPECIALTY & GENERIC · USA

Qilian International Holding Group Limited manufactures and distributes active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), traditional Chinese medicine derivatives (TCMD), and other by-products in China. The company is headquartered in Jiuquan, the People's Republic of China.

Teva Pharma Industries Ltd ADR

HEALTHCARE · DRUG MANUFACTURERS - SPECIALTY & GENERIC · USA

Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited, a pharmaceutical company, develops, manufactures, markets, and distributes generic drugs, specialty drugs, and biopharmaceuticals in North America, Europe, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Petach Tikva, Israel.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?