WallStSmart

BHP Group Limited (BHP)vsMP Materials Corp (MP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

BHP Group Limited generates 19499% more annual revenue ($53.99B vs $275.46M). BHP leads profitability with a 19.0% profit margin vs -31.2%. BHP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

BHP

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 8.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0

MP

Avoid

28

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.13
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

BHPUndervalued (+57.7%)

Margin of Safety

+57.7%

Fair Value

$188.14

Current Price

$67.37

$120.77 discount

UndervaluedFair: $188.14Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for MP.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BHP6 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Operating MarginProfitability
40.7%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 40.7%

Market CapQuality
$179.69B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
24.7%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 25 in profit

P/E RatioValuation
17.5x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

EPS GrowthGrowth
27.5%8/10

Earnings expanding 27.5% YoY

Free Cash FlowQuality
$4.31B8/10

Generating 4.3B in free cash flow

MP1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
70.0%10/10

Revenue surging 70.0% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

BHP1 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
5.952/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

MP4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
-5.0%2/10

ROE of -5.0% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-55.6%2/10

Earnings declined 55.6%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-109.26M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.132/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BHP

The strongest argument for BHP centers on Operating Margin, Market Cap, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 19.0% and operating margin at 40.7%. Revenue growth of 10.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : MP

The strongest argument for MP centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 70.0% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : BHP

The primary concerns for BHP are PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : MP

The primary concerns for MP are Return on Equity, EPS Growth, Free Cash Flow.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BHP profiles as a mature stock while MP is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

MP carries more volatility with a beta of 1.62 — expect wider price swings.

MP is growing revenue faster at 70.0% — sustainability is the question.

BHP generates stronger free cash flow (4.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

BHP scores higher overall (64/100 vs 28/100), backed by strong 19.0% margins and 10.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

BHP Group Limited

BASIC MATERIALS · OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING · USA

BHP Group engages in the natural resources business in Australia, Europe, China, Japan, India, South Korea, the rest of Asia, North America, South America and internationally. The company is headquartered in Melbourne, Australia.

MP Materials Corp

BASIC MATERIALS · OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING · USA

MP Materials Corp. The company is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?