WallStSmart

Bridgeline Digital Inc (BLIN)vsPalo Alto Networks Inc (PANW)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Palo Alto Networks Inc generates 63536% more annual revenue ($9.89B vs $15.55M). PANW leads profitability with a 13.0% profit margin vs -10.7%. PANW earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 57/100 (C).

BLIN

Avoid

34

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.0Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: -7.23

PANW

Buy

57

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 8.0Profit: 6.0Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.02
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for BLIN.

PANWUndervalued (+39.7%)

Margin of Safety

+39.7%

Fair Value

$441.96

Current Price

$272.05

$169.91 discount

UndervaluedFair: $441.96Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BLIN2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0610/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

PANW3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Market CapQuality
$241.01B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

EPS GrowthGrowth
60.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 60.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0710/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

BLIN4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.1%4/10

1.1% revenue growth

Market CapQuality
$14.24M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-18.1%2/10

ROE of -18.1% — below average capital efficiency

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-47,0002/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

PANW4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
3.0%3/10

ROE of 3.0% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
5.042/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
256.2x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BLIN

The strongest argument for BLIN centers on Price/Book, Debt/Equity.

Bull Case : PANW

The strongest argument for PANW centers on Market Cap, EPS Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 14.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : BLIN

The primary concerns for BLIN are Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : PANW

The primary concerns for PANW are Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. A P/E of 256.2x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BLIN profiles as a turnaround stock while PANW is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

BLIN carries more volatility with a beta of 0.99 — expect wider price swings.

PANW is growing revenue faster at 14.9% — sustainability is the question.

PANW generates stronger free cash flow (788M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

PANW scores higher overall (57/100 vs 34/100) and 14.9% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Bridgeline Digital Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Bridgeline Digital, Inc. is a digital participation company in the United States.

Visit Website →

Palo Alto Networks Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. provides cybersecurity platform solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Santa Clara, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?