WallStSmart

BlackRock Inc (BLK)vsAxa Equitable Holdings Inc (EQH)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

BlackRock Inc generates 157% more annual revenue ($27.30B vs $10.62B). BLK leads profitability with a 24.1% profit margin vs -8.7%. BLK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 78/100 (B+).

BLK

Strong Buy

78

out of 100

Grade: B+

Growth: 8.7Profit: 7.5Value: 6.3Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.11

EQH

Hold

37

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: -0.16

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BLK6 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
Operating MarginProfitability
35.1%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 35.1%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
30.6%10/10

Revenue surging 30.6% year-over-year

Market CapQuality
$175.42B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Profit MarginProfitability
24.1%9/10

Keeps 24 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Debt/EquityHealth
0.269/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

PEG RatioValuation
0.898/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

EQH2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
1244.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 1244.0% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
-4.8910/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

BLK3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
25.4x4/10

Moderate valuation

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.112/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

EQH4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-301.1%2/10

ROE of -301.1% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-29.8%2/10

Revenue declined 29.8%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
-0.162/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BLK

The strongest argument for BLK centers on Operating Margin, Revenue Growth, Market Cap. Profitability is solid with margins at 24.1% and operating margin at 35.1%. Revenue growth of 30.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : EQH

The strongest argument for EQH centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : BLK

The primary concerns for BLK are P/E Ratio, Piotroski F-Score, Altman Z-Score.

Bear Case : EQH

The primary concerns for EQH are Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BLK profiles as a growth stock while EQH is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

BLK carries more volatility with a beta of 1.43 — expect wider price swings.

BLK is growing revenue faster at 30.6% — sustainability is the question.

EQH generates stronger free cash flow (633M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

BLK scores higher overall (78/100 vs 37/100), backed by strong 24.1% margins and 30.6% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

BlackRock Inc

FINANCIAL SERVICES · ASSET MANAGEMENT · USA

BlackRock, Inc. is an American multinational investment management corporation based in New York City.

Axa Equitable Holdings Inc

FINANCIAL SERVICES · ASSET MANAGEMENT · USA

Equitable Holdings, Inc. is a globally diversified financial services company. The company is headquartered in New York, New York.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?