Boot Barn Holdings Inc (BOOT)vsLululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU)
BOOT
Boot Barn Holdings Inc
$144.39
+2.64%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $4.62B
LULU
Lululemon Athletica Inc.
$98.97
+2.16%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $11.42B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Lululemon Athletica Inc. generates 373% more annual revenue ($11.09B vs $2.34B). LULU leads profitability with a 12.8% profit margin vs 10.3%. LULU appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.77. BOOT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).
BOOT
Strong Buy67
out of 100
Grade: B-
LULU
Buy62
out of 100
Grade: C+
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
-66.7%
Fair Value
$113.78
Current Price
$144.39
$30.61 premium
Margin of Safety
+70.5%
Fair Value
$597.24
Current Price
$98.97
$498.27 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
17.7% revenue growth
Earnings expanding 31.6% YoY
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Every $100 of equity generates 30 in profit
Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk
Growing faster than its price suggests
Reasonable price relative to book value
Areas to Watch
Expensive relative to growth rate
Weak financial health signals
Revenue declined 4.3%
Earnings declined 5.9%
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : BOOT
The strongest argument for BOOT centers on Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 17.7% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : LULU
The strongest argument for LULU centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Altman Z-Score. PEG of 0.77 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : BOOT
The primary concerns for BOOT are PEG Ratio.
Bear Case : LULU
The primary concerns for LULU are Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
BOOT profiles as a growth stock while LULU is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.
BOOT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.70 — expect wider price swings.
BOOT is growing revenue faster at 17.7% — sustainability is the question.
LULU generates stronger free cash flow (87M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
BOOT scores higher overall (67/100 vs 62/100) and 17.7% revenue growth. LULU offers better value entry with a 70.5% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Boot Barn Holdings Inc
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL RETAIL · USA
Boot Barn Holdings, Inc., a lifestyle retail chain, operates specialty retail stores in the United States. The company is headquartered in Irvine, California.
Lululemon Athletica Inc.
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL RETAIL · USA
lululemon athletica inc. The company is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.
Visit Website →Compare with Other APPAREL RETAIL Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?