WallStSmart

Boot Barn Holdings Inc (BOOT)vsLululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Lululemon Athletica Inc. generates 412% more annual revenue ($11.10B vs $2.17B). LULU leads profitability with a 14.2% profit margin vs 10.1%. LULU appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.91. LULU earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (B-).

BOOT

Buy

62

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.7Profit: 7.5Value: 8.7Quality: 7.3
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.04

LULU

Strong Buy

65

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.7Profit: 8.5Value: 7.3Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 4.32
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

BOOTUndervalued (+12.9%)

Margin of Safety

+12.9%

Fair Value

$217.63

Current Price

$157.89

$59.74 discount

UndervaluedFair: $217.63Overvalued
LULUSignificantly Overvalued (-82.8%)

Margin of Safety

-82.8%

Fair Value

$96.22

Current Price

$162.82

$66.60 premium

UndervaluedFair: $96.22Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BOOT2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.0410/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Revenue GrowthGrowth
16.0%8/10

16.0% revenue growth

LULU6 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
11.5x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
34.0%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 34 in profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
80.0%10/10

Revenue surging 80.0% year-over-year

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.3210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

PEG RatioValuation
0.918/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Operating MarginProfitability
22.3%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 22.3%

Areas to Watch

BOOT1 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.724/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

LULU2 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-18.5%2/10

Earnings declined 18.5%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BOOT

The strongest argument for BOOT centers on Altman Z-Score, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 16.0% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : LULU

The strongest argument for LULU centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 80.0% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.91 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : BOOT

The primary concerns for BOOT are PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : LULU

The primary concerns for LULU are Piotroski F-Score, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BOOT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.68 — expect wider price swings.

LULU is growing revenue faster at 80.0% — sustainability is the question.

LULU generates stronger free cash flow (922M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor APPAREL RETAIL industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

LULU scores higher overall (65/100 vs 62/100) and 80.0% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Boot Barn Holdings Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL RETAIL · USA

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc., a lifestyle retail chain, operates specialty retail stores in the United States. The company is headquartered in Irvine, California.

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL RETAIL · USA

lululemon athletica inc. The company is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?