WallStSmart

Bragg Gaming Group Inc (BRAG)vsFlutter Entertainment plc (FLUT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Flutter Entertainment plc generates 16556% more annual revenue ($17.16B vs $103.03M). FLUT leads profitability with a -4.4% profit margin vs -7.5%. FLUT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 46/100 (D+).

BRAG

Hold

39

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.0Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.62

FLUT

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 2.0Value: 5.7Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.29
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for BRAG.

FLUTSignificantly Overvalued (-28.1%)

Margin of Safety

-28.1%

Fair Value

$112.63

Current Price

$89.56

$23.07 premium

UndervaluedFair: $112.63Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BRAG3 strengths · Avg: 9.7/10
Price/BookValuation
0.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
309.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 309.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.119/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

FLUT2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.1910/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
1.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

BRAG4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$41.63M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-12.0%2/10

ROE of -12.0% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-12.2%2/10

Revenue declined 12.2%

FLUT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.3%4/10

3.3% revenue growth

Debt/EquityHealth
1.443/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-9.1%2/10

ROE of -9.1% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BRAG

The strongest argument for BRAG centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth, Debt/Equity.

Bull Case : FLUT

The strongest argument for FLUT centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.19 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : BRAG

The primary concerns for BRAG are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : FLUT

The primary concerns for FLUT are Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FLUT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.07 — expect wider price swings.

FLUT is growing revenue faster at 3.3% — sustainability is the question.

FLUT generates stronger free cash flow (189M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor GAMBLING industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

FLUT scores higher overall (46/100 vs 39/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Bragg Gaming Group Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · GAMBLING · USA

Bragg Gaming Group Inc. provides global business-to-business online gaming solutions. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

Flutter Entertainment plc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · GAMBLING · USA

Flutter Entertainment plc is a sports betting and gaming company in the United Kingdom, Ireland, Australia, the United States, Italy, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Dublin, Ireland.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?