WallStSmart

biote Corp (BTMD)vsFresenius Medical Care Corporation (FMS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Fresenius Medical Care Corporation generates 10111% more annual revenue ($19.63B vs $192.22M). BTMD leads profitability with a 14.1% profit margin vs 5.0%. BTMD trades at a lower P/E of 2.1x. FMS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 62/100 (C+).

BTMD

Hold

37

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 3.3Profit: 6.5Value: 8.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 1.54

FMS

Buy

62

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.0Value: 10.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.82
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

BTMDUndervalued (+57.9%)

Margin of Safety

+57.9%

Fair Value

$5.03

Current Price

$1.47

$3.56 discount

UndervaluedFair: $5.03Overvalued
FMSUndervalued (+73.4%)

Margin of Safety

+73.4%

Fair Value

$90.32

Current Price

$22.26

$68.06 discount

UndervaluedFair: $90.32Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BTMD2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
2.1x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Debt/EquityHealth
-1.4610/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

FMS3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
11.2x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

PEG RatioValuation
0.738/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Areas to Watch

BTMD4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.544/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Market CapQuality
$67.48M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
0.0%3/10

ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-6.9%2/10

Revenue declined 6.9%

FMS4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
4.2%4/10

4.2% earnings growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.824/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Return on EquityProfitability
7.9%3/10

ROE of 7.9% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
5.0%3/10

5.0% margin — thin

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BTMD

The strongest argument for BTMD centers on P/E Ratio, Debt/Equity.

Bull Case : FMS

The strongest argument for FMS centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.73 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : BTMD

The primary concerns for BTMD are Altman Z-Score, Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : FMS

The primary concerns for FMS are EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. Thin 5.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BTMD profiles as a declining stock while FMS is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

BTMD carries more volatility with a beta of 1.14 — expect wider price swings.

FMS is growing revenue faster at -0.3% — sustainability is the question.

FMS generates stronger free cash flow (564M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FMS scores higher overall (62/100 vs 37/100). BTMD offers better value entry with a 57.9% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

biote Corp

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES · USA

biote corp. The company is headquartered in Irvine, Texas.

Fresenius Medical Care Corporation

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES · USA

Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA provides dialysis care and related dialysis care services in Germany, North America and internationally. The company is headquartered in Bad Homburg, Germany.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?