Bowman Consulting Group Ltd (BWMN)vsFerrovial SE (FER)
BWMN
Bowman Consulting Group Ltd
$42.46
0.00%
INDUSTRIALS · Cap: $736.86M
FER
Ferrovial SE
$55.04
+0.71%
INDUSTRIALS · Cap: $40.76B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Ferrovial SE generates 1769% more annual revenue ($9.86B vs $527.60M). FER leads profitability with a 6.2% profit margin vs 1.4%. FER trades at a lower P/E of 58.9x. FER earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 38/100 (F).
BWMN
Hold38
out of 100
Grade: F
FER
Hold38
out of 100
Grade: F
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
-16.9%
Fair Value
$30.49
Current Price
$42.46
$11.97 premium
Intrinsic value data unavailable for FER.
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Reasonable price relative to book value
19.7% revenue growth
No standout strengths identified
Areas to Watch
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
ROE of 2.8% — below average capital efficiency
1.4% margin — thin
Elevated debt levels
6.2% margin — thin
Elevated debt levels
Expensive relative to growth rate
Premium valuation, high expectations priced in
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : BWMN
The strongest argument for BWMN centers on Price/Book, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 19.7% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : FER
FER has a balanced fundamental profile.
Bear Case : BWMN
The primary concerns for BWMN are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 101.2x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 1.4% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Bear Case : FER
The primary concerns for FER are Profit Margin, Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio. A P/E of 58.9x leaves little room for execution misses. Debt-to-equity of 1.86 is elevated, increasing financial risk.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
BWMN profiles as a growth stock while FER is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.
BWMN carries more volatility with a beta of 1.44 — expect wider price swings.
BWMN is growing revenue faster at 19.7% — sustainability is the question.
FER generates stronger free cash flow (733M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
BWMN scores higher overall (38/100 vs 38/100) and 19.7% revenue growth. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Bowman Consulting Group Ltd
INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA
Bowman Consulting Group Ltd., a consulting firm, offers a range of real estate, energy, infrastructure and environmental management solutions in the United States. The company is headquartered in Reston, Virginia.
Ferrovial SE
INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA
Ferrovial SE, engages in the development, construction, and operation of highways and airports in the United States, Poland, Spain, the United Kingdom, Canada, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Compare with Other ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?