China Automotive Systems Inc (CAAS)vsMagna International Inc (MGA)
CAAS
China Automotive Systems Inc
$5.36
+1.90%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $161.72M
MGA
Magna International Inc
$66.13
+1.52%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $17.81B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Magna International Inc generates 5011% more annual revenue ($42.67B vs $834.86M). CAAS leads profitability with a 6.9% profit margin vs 1.8%. CAAS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.37. CAAS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 68/100 (B-).
CAAS
Strong Buy68
out of 100
Grade: B-
MGA
Buy64
out of 100
Grade: C+
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Intrinsic value data unavailable for CAAS.
Margin of Safety
+47.2%
Fair Value
$109.51
Current Price
$66.13
$43.38 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Growing faster than its price suggests
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Earnings expanding 94.0% YoY
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
17.0% revenue growth
Growing faster than its price suggests
Reasonable price relative to book value
Earnings expanding 27.8% YoY
Areas to Watch
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
6.9% margin — thin
3.3% revenue growth
ROE of 6.4% — below average capital efficiency
1.8% margin — thin
Weak financial health signals
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : CAAS
The strongest argument for CAAS centers on PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 17.0% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.37 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : MGA
The strongest argument for MGA centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book, EPS Growth. PEG of 0.44 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : CAAS
The primary concerns for CAAS are Market Cap, Profit Margin.
Bear Case : MGA
The primary concerns for MGA are Revenue Growth, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Thin 1.8% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
CAAS profiles as a growth stock while MGA is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.
MGA carries more volatility with a beta of 1.83 — expect wider price swings.
CAAS is growing revenue faster at 17.0% — sustainability is the question.
MGA generates stronger free cash flow (654M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
CAAS scores higher overall (68/100 vs 64/100) and 17.0% revenue growth. MGA offers better value entry with a 47.2% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
China Automotive Systems Inc
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO PARTS · USA
China Automotive Systems, Inc. manufactures and sells automotive components and systems in the People's Republic of China. The company is headquartered in Jingzhou City, the People's Republic of China.
Visit Website →Magna International Inc
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO PARTS · USA
Magna International Inc. designs, designs and manufactures components, assemblies, systems, subsystems and modules for vehicle and light truck original equipment manufacturers worldwide. The company is headquartered in Aurora, Canada.
Compare with Other AUTO PARTS Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?