WallStSmart

Cable One Inc (CABO)vsMeta Platforms Inc. (META)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Meta Platforms Inc. generates 15733% more annual revenue ($228.25B vs $1.44B). META leads profitability with a 29.8% profit margin vs -72.8%. META appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.85. META earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 71/100 (B).

CABO

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 4.5Value: 4.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.53

META

Strong Buy

71

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 6.0Profit: 9.5Value: 8.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.88
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CABO.

METAUndervalued (+31.3%)

Margin of Safety

+31.3%

Fair Value

$943.81

Current Price

$648.03

$295.78 discount

UndervaluedFair: $943.81Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CABO3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Price/BookValuation
0.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
1230.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 1230.0% YoY

Operating MarginProfitability
23.2%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 23.2%

META6 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$1.65T10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Operating MarginProfitability
34.8%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 34.8%

Return on EquityProfitability
26.1%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 26 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
29.8%9/10

Keeps 30 of every $100 in revenue as profit

PEG RatioValuation
0.858/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Revenue GrowthGrowth
28.0%8/10

Revenue surging 28.0% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

CABO4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$120.91M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
5.112/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-19.9%2/10

ROE of -19.9% — below average capital efficiency

META2 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-13.4%2/10

Earnings declined 13.4%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CABO

The strongest argument for CABO centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth, Operating Margin.

Bull Case : META

The strongest argument for META centers on Market Cap, Operating Margin, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 29.8% and operating margin at 34.8%. Revenue growth of 28.0% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CABO

The primary concerns for CABO are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 9.35 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : META

The primary concerns for META are Piotroski F-Score, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CABO profiles as a turnaround stock while META is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

META carries more volatility with a beta of 1.24 — expect wider price swings.

META is growing revenue faster at 28.0% — sustainability is the question.

META generates stronger free cash flow (1.7B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

META scores higher overall (71/100 vs 55/100), backed by strong 29.8% margins and 28.0% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cable One Inc

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · TELECOM SERVICES · USA

Cable One, Inc., provides voice, video and data services in the United States. The company is headquartered in Phoenix, Arizona.

Meta Platforms Inc.

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · INTERNET CONTENT & INFORMATION · USA

Meta Platforms, Inc. develops products that enable people to connect and share with friends and family through mobile devices, PCs, virtual reality headsets, wearables and home devices around the world. The company is headquartered in Menlo Park, California.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?