WallStSmart

Cardinal Health Inc (CAH)vsNatera Inc (NTRA)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Cardinal Health Inc generates 10773% more annual revenue ($250.74B vs $2.31B). CAH leads profitability with a 0.6% profit margin vs -9.0%. CAH earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 47/100 (D+).

CAH

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 4.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 4.30

NTRA

Avoid

31

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 8.0Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 4/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CAHUndervalued (+73.9%)

Margin of Safety

+73.9%

Fair Value

$859.62

Current Price

$183.65

$675.97 discount

UndervaluedFair: $859.62Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for NTRA.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CAH2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.3010/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.68B8/10

Generating 1.7B in free cash flow

NTRA1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
39.8%10/10

Revenue surging 39.8% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

CAH4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
28.2x4/10

Moderate valuation

Return on EquityProfitability
0.0%3/10

ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
0.6%3/10

0.6% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
1.4%3/10

Operating margin of 1.4%

NTRA4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Price/BookValuation
15.8x4/10

Trading at 15.8x book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Return on EquityProfitability
-14.3%2/10

ROE of -14.3% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
-9.0%1/10

Currently unprofitable

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CAH

The strongest argument for CAH centers on Altman Z-Score, Free Cash Flow. Revenue growth of 11.0% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.25 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : NTRA

The strongest argument for NTRA centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 39.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CAH

The primary concerns for CAH are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Thin 0.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : NTRA

The primary concerns for NTRA are Price/Book, EPS Growth, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CAH profiles as a value stock while NTRA is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

NTRA carries more volatility with a beta of 1.57 — expect wider price swings.

NTRA is growing revenue faster at 39.8% — sustainability is the question.

CAH generates stronger free cash flow (1.7B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CAH scores higher overall (47/100 vs 31/100) and 11.0% revenue growth. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cardinal Health Inc

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL DISTRIBUTION · USA

Cardinal Health, Inc. is an American multinational health care services company.

Visit Website →

Natera Inc

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Natera, Inc., a diagnostic company, develops and markets molecular testing services globally. The company is headquartered in San Carlos, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?