WallStSmart

Cardinal Health Inc (CAH)vsVertiv Holdings Co (VRT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Cardinal Health Inc generates 2212% more annual revenue ($250.74B vs $10.84B). VRT leads profitability with a 14.4% profit margin vs 0.6%. CAH appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.14. VRT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

CAH

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 4.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 4.30

VRT

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 10.0Profit: 8.0Value: 3.7Quality: 6.3
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.25
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CAHUndervalued (+73.9%)

Margin of Safety

+73.9%

Fair Value

$859.62

Current Price

$182.50

$677.12 discount

UndervaluedFair: $859.62Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for VRT.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CAH2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.3010/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.68B8/10

Generating 1.7B in free cash flow

VRT4 strengths · Avg: 9.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
45.1%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 45 in profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
30.1%10/10

Revenue surging 30.1% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
135.7%10/10

Earnings expanding 135.7% YoY

Market CapQuality
$130.60B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

CAH4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
28.0x4/10

Moderate valuation

Return on EquityProfitability
0.0%3/10

ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
0.6%3/10

0.6% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
1.4%3/10

Operating margin of 1.4%

VRT3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.664/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
85.4x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
35.7x2/10

Trading at 35.7x book value

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CAH

The strongest argument for CAH centers on Altman Z-Score, Free Cash Flow. Revenue growth of 11.0% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.14 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : VRT

The strongest argument for VRT centers on Return on Equity, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 30.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CAH

The primary concerns for CAH are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Thin 0.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : VRT

The primary concerns for VRT are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. A P/E of 85.4x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CAH profiles as a value stock while VRT is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

VRT carries more volatility with a beta of 2.10 — expect wider price swings.

VRT is growing revenue faster at 30.1% — sustainability is the question.

CAH generates stronger free cash flow (1.7B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

VRT scores higher overall (67/100 vs 47/100) and 30.1% revenue growth. CAH offers better value entry with a 73.9% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cardinal Health Inc

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL DISTRIBUTION · USA

Cardinal Health, Inc. is an American multinational health care services company.

Visit Website →

Vertiv Holdings Co

INDUSTRIALS · ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT & PARTS · USA

Vertiv Holdings Co designs, manufactures and services critical digital infrastructure technologies and lifecycle services for data centers, communication networks, and commercial and industrial environments in the Americas, Asia Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. The company is headquartered in Columbus, Ohio.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?