WallStSmart

Carrier Global Corp (CARR)vsWPP PLC ADR (WPP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Carrier Global Corp generates 61% more annual revenue ($21.87B vs $13.55B). CARR leads profitability with a 6.0% profit margin vs -1.6%. CARR appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.62. CARR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 43/100 (D).

CARR

Hold

43

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 4.0Profit: 4.5Value: 4.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.62

WPP

Avoid

32

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 3.0Value: 5.7Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.73
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CARROvervalued (-12.5%)

Margin of Safety

-12.5%

Fair Value

$59.64

Current Price

$67.90

$8.26 premium

UndervaluedFair: $59.64Overvalued
WPPUndervalued (+75.7%)

Margin of Safety

+75.7%

Fair Value

$75.34

Current Price

$18.53

$56.81 discount

UndervaluedFair: $75.34Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CARR1 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$56.16B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

WPP1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.71B8/10

Generating 1.7B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

CARR4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.624/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.4%4/10

2.4% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.624/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Profit MarginProfitability
6.0%3/10

6.0% margin — thin

WPP4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
2.2%3/10

Operating margin of 2.2%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
4.232/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-5.3%2/10

ROE of -5.3% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CARR

The strongest argument for CARR centers on Market Cap.

Bull Case : WPP

The strongest argument for WPP centers on Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : CARR

The primary concerns for CARR are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score. A P/E of 45.1x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : WPP

The primary concerns for WPP are Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 2.13 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CARR profiles as a value stock while WPP is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

CARR carries more volatility with a beta of 1.32 — expect wider price swings.

CARR is growing revenue faster at 2.4% — sustainability is the question.

WPP generates stronger free cash flow (1.7B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CARR scores higher overall (43/100 vs 32/100). WPP offers better value entry with a 75.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Carrier Global Corp

INDUSTRIALS · BUILDING PRODUCTS & EQUIPMENT · USA

Carrier Global Corporation is an American multinational home appliances corporation based in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida.

Visit Website →

WPP PLC ADR

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

WPP plc, a creative transformation company, provides communications, expertise, trade and technology services in North America, the UK, Western Continental Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, and Central and Eastern Europe. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?