WallStSmart

Cato Corporation (CATO)vsLululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Lululemon Athletica Inc. generates 1606% more annual revenue ($11.10B vs $650.83M). LULU leads profitability with a 14.2% profit margin vs -2.9%. LULU appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.90. LULU earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (B-).

CATO

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 2.5Value: 6.7Quality: 5.0

LULU

Strong Buy

65

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.5Value: 7.3Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 4.32
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CATO.

LULUSignificantly Overvalued (-95.2%)

Margin of Safety

-95.2%

Fair Value

$90.10

Current Price

$158.72

$68.62 premium

UndervaluedFair: $90.10Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CATO2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
63.3%10/10

Earnings expanding 63.3% YoY

LULU5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
P/E RatioValuation
12.0x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
34.0%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 34 in profit

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.3210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

PEG RatioValuation
0.908/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Operating MarginProfitability
22.3%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 22.3%

Areas to Watch

CATO4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.7%4/10

4.7% revenue growth

Market CapQuality
$69.04M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Operating MarginProfitability
2.9%3/10

Operating margin of 2.9%

Return on EquityProfitability
-10.3%2/10

ROE of -10.3% — below average capital efficiency

LULU3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.8%4/10

0.8% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-18.5%2/10

Earnings declined 18.5%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CATO

The strongest argument for CATO centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth. PEG of 1.17 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : LULU

The strongest argument for LULU centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Altman Z-Score. PEG of 0.90 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CATO

The primary concerns for CATO are Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : LULU

The primary concerns for LULU are Revenue Growth, Piotroski F-Score, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CATO profiles as a turnaround stock while LULU is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

LULU carries more volatility with a beta of 1.01 — expect wider price swings.

CATO is growing revenue faster at 4.7% — sustainability is the question.

LULU generates stronger free cash flow (960M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

LULU scores higher overall (65/100 vs 53/100). Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cato Corporation

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL RETAIL · USA

The Cato Corporation is a specialty clothing and fashion accessories retailer primarily in the southeastern United States. The company is headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina.

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL RETAIL · USA

lululemon athletica inc. The company is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?