WallStSmart

Cato Corporation (CATO)vsLululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Lululemon Athletica Inc. generates 1624% more annual revenue ($11.09B vs $643.67M). LULU leads profitability with a 12.8% profit margin vs -0.9%. LULU appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.77. LULU earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 62/100 (C+).

CATO

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 2.0Value: 7.0Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.04

LULU

Buy

62

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 7.5Value: 9.3Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 4.12
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CATOUndervalued (+75.6%)

Margin of Safety

+75.6%

Fair Value

$12.36

Current Price

$2.41

$9.95 discount

UndervaluedFair: $12.36Overvalued
LULUUndervalued (+70.5%)

Margin of Safety

+70.5%

Fair Value

$597.24

Current Price

$98.97

$498.27 discount

UndervaluedFair: $597.24Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CATO1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

LULU5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
P/E RatioValuation
8.5x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
30.3%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 30 in profit

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.1210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

PEG RatioValuation
0.778/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
2.3x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CATO4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Market CapQuality
$47.99M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-3.7%2/10

ROE of -3.7% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-6.2%2/10

Revenue declined 6.2%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-83.3%2/10

Earnings declined 83.3%

LULU3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-4.3%2/10

Revenue declined 4.3%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-5.9%2/10

Earnings declined 5.9%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CATO

The strongest argument for CATO centers on Price/Book. PEG of 1.17 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : LULU

The strongest argument for LULU centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Altman Z-Score. PEG of 0.77 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CATO

The primary concerns for CATO are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : LULU

The primary concerns for LULU are Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CATO profiles as a turnaround stock while LULU is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

LULU carries more volatility with a beta of 0.86 — expect wider price swings.

LULU is growing revenue faster at -4.3% — sustainability is the question.

LULU generates stronger free cash flow (87M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

LULU scores higher overall (62/100 vs 40/100). CATO offers better value entry with a 75.6% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cato Corporation

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL RETAIL · USA

The Cato Corporation is a specialty clothing and fashion accessories retailer primarily in the southeastern United States. The company is headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina.

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL RETAIL · USA

lululemon athletica inc. The company is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?