WallStSmart

CBAK Energy Technology Inc (CBAT)vsDeere & Company (DE)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Deere & Company generates 20493% more annual revenue ($47.34B vs $229.87M). DE leads profitability with a 10.1% profit margin vs -7.4%. DE earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 49/100 (D+).

CBAT

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 7.3Profit: 2.0Value: 6.7Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: -0.20

DE

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 7.0Value: 4.3Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.18
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CBATUndervalued (+89.8%)

Margin of Safety

+89.8%

Fair Value

$8.42

Current Price

$0.63

$7.79 discount

UndervaluedFair: $8.42Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for DE.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CBAT3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
99.3%10/10

Revenue surging 99.3% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
15062.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 15062.0% YoY

DE1 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$155.34B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

CBAT4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$59.84M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-16.3%2/10

ROE of -16.3% — below average capital efficiency

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
-0.202/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

DE4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.754/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
32.6x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-11.1%2/10

Revenue declined 11.1%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CBAT

The strongest argument for CBAT centers on Price/Book, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 99.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : DE

The strongest argument for DE centers on Market Cap.

Bear Case : CBAT

The primary concerns for CBAT are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : DE

The primary concerns for DE are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 2.34 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CBAT profiles as a hypergrowth stock while DE is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

CBAT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.27 — expect wider price swings.

CBAT is growing revenue faster at 99.3% — sustainability is the question.

DE generates stronger free cash flow (874M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CBAT scores higher overall (49/100 vs 49/100) and 99.3% revenue growth. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

CBAK Energy Technology Inc

INDUSTRIALS · ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT & PARTS · China

CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. develops, manufactures, and sells lithium batteries in mainland China, the United States, Israel, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Dalian, China.

Deere & Company

INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA

John Deere is the brand name of Deere & Company, an American corporation that manufactures agricultural, construction, and forestry machinery, diesel engines, drivetrains (axles, transmissions, gearboxes) used in heavy equipment, and lawn care equipment.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?