WallStSmart

Coca-Cola European Partners PLC (CCEP)vs17 Education Technology Group Inc (YQ)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Coca-Cola European Partners PLC generates 19613% more annual revenue ($20.90B vs $106.02M). CCEP leads profitability with a 9.3% profit margin vs -145.6%. CCEP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 57/100 (C).

CCEP

Buy

57

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.7Profit: 7.0Value: 4.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.59

YQ

Avoid

35

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.0Profit: 2.0Value: 6.0Quality: 6.3
Piotroski: 3/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CCEP.

YQUndervalued (+25.3%)

Margin of Safety

+25.3%

Fair Value

$4.62

Current Price

$2.35

$2.27 discount

UndervaluedFair: $4.62Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CCEP3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Return on EquityProfitability
42.9%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 43 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
68.3%10/10

Earnings expanding 68.3% YoY

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.51B8/10

Generating 1.5B in free cash flow

YQ2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.6x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0510/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

CCEP4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.2%4/10

0.2% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.594/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Debt/EquityHealth
1.383/10

Elevated debt levels

PEG RatioValuation
2.722/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

YQ4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$21.79M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-45.4%2/10

ROE of -45.4% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CCEP

The strongest argument for CCEP centers on Return on Equity, EPS Growth, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : YQ

The strongest argument for YQ centers on Price/Book, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : CCEP

The primary concerns for CCEP are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : YQ

The primary concerns for YQ are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CCEP profiles as a value stock while YQ is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

YQ carries more volatility with a beta of 0.91 — expect wider price swings.

YQ is growing revenue faster at 6.4% — sustainability is the question.

CCEP generates stronger free cash flow (1.5B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CCEP scores higher overall (57/100 vs 35/100). YQ offers better value entry with a 25.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Coca-Cola European Partners PLC

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · BEVERAGES - NON-ALCOHOLIC · USA

Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC produces, distributes and sells a variety of ready-to-drink non-alcoholic beverages. The company is headquartered in Uxbridge, the United Kingdom.

Visit Website →

17 Education Technology Group Inc

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · EDUCATION & TRAINING SERVICES · China

17 Education & Technology Group Inc., an educational technology company, provides K-12 online education services in the People's Republic of China. The company is headquartered in Beijing, the People's Republic of China.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?