WallStSmart

Concord Medical Services Holdings (CCM)vsFresenius Medical Care Corporation (FMS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Fresenius Medical Care Corporation generates 5266% more annual revenue ($19.63B vs $365.76M). FMS leads profitability with a 5.0% profit margin vs -44.6%. FMS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 62/100 (C+).

CCM

Avoid

23

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: -1.10

FMS

Buy

62

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.0Value: 10.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.82
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CCM.

FMSUndervalued (+73.4%)

Margin of Safety

+73.4%

Fair Value

$90.32

Current Price

$22.26

$68.06 discount

UndervaluedFair: $90.32Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CCM1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Debt/EquityHealth
-1.7110/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

FMS3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
11.2x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

PEG RatioValuation
0.738/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Areas to Watch

CCM4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$15.85M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-29.0%2/10

ROE of -29.0% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-8.3%2/10

Revenue declined 8.3%

FMS4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
4.2%4/10

4.2% earnings growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.824/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Return on EquityProfitability
7.9%3/10

ROE of 7.9% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
5.0%3/10

5.0% margin — thin

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CCM

The strongest argument for CCM centers on Debt/Equity.

Bull Case : FMS

The strongest argument for FMS centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.73 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CCM

The primary concerns for CCM are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : FMS

The primary concerns for FMS are EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. Thin 5.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CCM profiles as a turnaround stock while FMS is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

FMS carries more volatility with a beta of 0.94 — expect wider price swings.

FMS is growing revenue faster at -0.3% — sustainability is the question.

Monitor MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

FMS scores higher overall (62/100 vs 23/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Concord Medical Services Holdings

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES · China

Concord Medical Services Holdings Limited, operates a network of radiotherapy and diagnostic imaging centers in the People's Republic of China. The company is headquartered in Beijing, the People's Republic of China.

Visit Website →

Fresenius Medical Care Corporation

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES · USA

Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA provides dialysis care and related dialysis care services in Germany, North America and internationally. The company is headquartered in Bad Homburg, Germany.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?