WallStSmart

Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings Inc (CCO)vsWPP PLC ADR (WPP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

WPP PLC ADR generates 690% more annual revenue ($13.26B vs $1.68B). WPP leads profitability with a -1.8% profit margin vs -6.3%. WPP appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 4.23. CCO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 41/100 (D).

CCO

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.0Value: 5.7Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: -1.81

WPP

Avoid

34

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 4.0Value: 5.7Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.73
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CCOUndervalued (+37.0%)

Margin of Safety

+37.0%

Fair Value

$3.76

Current Price

$2.38

$1.38 discount

UndervaluedFair: $3.76Overvalued
WPPUndervalued (+67.4%)

Margin of Safety

+67.4%

Fair Value

$56.26

Current Price

$24.97

$31.29 discount

UndervaluedFair: $56.26Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CCO2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Debt/EquityHealth
-1.8710/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Operating MarginProfitability
21.4%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.4%

WPP0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

Areas to Watch

CCO4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$1.21B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
0.0%3/10

ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency

PEG RatioValuation
16.572/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-75.8%2/10

Earnings declined 75.8%

WPP4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
4.1%3/10

Operating margin of 4.1%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
4.232/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-4.4%2/10

Revenue declined 4.4%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CCO

The strongest argument for CCO centers on Debt/Equity, Operating Margin.

Bull Case : WPP

WPP has a balanced fundamental profile.

Bear Case : CCO

The primary concerns for CCO are Market Cap, Return on Equity, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : WPP

The primary concerns for WPP are Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 2.76 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CCO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.96 — expect wider price swings.

CCO is growing revenue faster at 8.7% — sustainability is the question.

CCO generates stronger free cash flow (13M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor ADVERTISING AGENCIES industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

CCO scores higher overall (41/100 vs 34/100). WPP offers better value entry with a 67.4% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings Inc

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. owns, operates and sells advertising displays in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in San Antonio, Texas.

WPP PLC ADR

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

WPP plc, a creative transformation company, provides communications, expertise, trade and technology services in North America, the UK, Western Continental Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, and Central and Eastern Europe. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?